Ethics of science communication on the web
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12858299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M L Clarke (Springer Nature (United Kingdom), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 9-12 |
| Publication date | 2008-11-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1611-8014 • E-ISSN: 1863-5415 |
| Publisher | I nt er-R es ea rc h (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.3354/esep00096 |
| OpenAlex | W1993349287 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Scientists have evolved a unit of communication to describe their new results and findings: the peer-reviewed scientific paper. The internet is full of erroneous and even dangerous information that is difficult for people without a scientific education or training to interpret in context, particularly given the uncertainties inherent in the scientific process. Those interpreting science for the public, whether journalists, educators or other communicators, should use peer review as a benchmark
Citation · Context (archaeology · Engineering ethics · Internet privacy · Library science · Media studies · Political science · Public relations · Publishing · Research ethics · RSS · Scholarly communication · Science communication · Science education · Scientific communication · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2009 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |