Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Struggle for Objectivity

Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology

Bibliographic Data

ID12865749
AuthorsPietro Daniel Omodeo (0000-0003-3561-1154, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume14
Issue2
Pages13-49
Publication date2020-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHoST - Journal of History of Science and Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1646-7752 • E-ISSN: 1646-7752
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.2478/host-2020-0013
OpenAlexW3117002718
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited2

This contribution interprets the intertwined issues of science, epistemology, society, and politics in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks as a culturalist approach to science that does not renounce objectivity. Gramsci particularly criticized the scientist positions taken by the Bolshevik leader Nikolai Bukharin in Historical Materialism (1921) and the conference communication he delivered at the International Congress of History of Science and Technology in London in 1931. Gramsci did not avoid, at least implicitly, engaging with the theses of Lenin’s Materialism and Empiriocriticism (1909). Gramsci’s reception of these Russian positions was twofold: on the one hand, he agreed with the centrality of praxis (and politics) for a correct assessment of the meaning of epistemological positions; on the other hand, he disagreed with the reduction of the problem of epistemology to the dichotomy of materialism and idealism at the expense of any consideration of the ideological dimension of science

Epistemology · Idealism · Ideology · Materialism · Objectivity (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Praxis · Social science · Sociology · Anarchism and Radical Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political theory and Gramsci

  • Ciência Experimental E Tradutibilidade. Objetividade E Ideologia Científica Nos Cadernos Do Cárcere

    Open Access•Camilla Sclocco•Revista Práxis e Hegemonia Popular•2023

  • Aleksandr Bogdanov and Lenin on “Things-In-Themselves”

    Open Access•Vesa Oittinen, Веса Ойттинен•Cultural Science Journal•2021

  • Beyond Facticity and Post-Truth

    Lukas Meisner, Pietro Daniel Omodeo•Historical Materialism•2025

  • The Struggle for Objectivity

    Open Access•Pietro Daniel Omodeo•HoST - Journal of History of…•2020

  • Hydrogeological Knowledge from Below

    Open Access•Pietro Daniel Omodeo•Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschicht…•2022

  • Ludwik Fleck’s reasonable relativism about science

    Open Access•Nicholas Binney•Synthese•2023

  • The Struggle for Objectivity

    Open Access•Pietro Daniel Omodeo•HoST - Journal of History of…•2020

  • Separate Spheres and Public Places

    Open Access•Roger Cooter, Stephen Pumfrey•History of Science•1994

Citations per year1
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae