Leksinių samplaikų sąrašo tikslinimas
Bandymas taikyti Formulex metodą
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12866268 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Łukasz Grabowski (0000-0002-3968-9218, University of Opole, corresponding author), Rita Juknevičienė (0000-0001-8222-4427, Vilnius University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 0 |
| Issue | 29 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies About Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1648-2824 • E-ISSN: 2029-7203 |
| Publisher | Kaunas University of Technology (KTU) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5755/j01.sal.0.29.15327 |
| OpenAlex | W2570039131 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
A number of corpus studies focusing on the description of the use and functions of lexical bundles havebeen conducted recently in order to explore the phraseology of learner language. As with any studiesof lexical bundles, the problem of overlapping or structurally incomplete items poses a particularchallenge. In practice, it is often difficult to align such units with specific discourse functions. The factthat lexical bundles do not constitute neat form-and-meaning mappings results from, among otherreasons, their being grounded in language use rather than language system. In this pilot study weattempt to test a new method called Formulex (Forsyth, 2015a; 2015b) to verify whether an applicationof the criterion of coverage – in addition to the conventional criteria of orthographic length, minimumfrequency and distribution range (Biber et al., 1999) – may help obtain a more refined inventory of lexicalbundles and hence facilitate further qualitative analyses. To that end, we use Polish and Lithuaniancomponents of the International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE, Granger et al., 2009), as well as theLOCNESS corpus (CECL), representing academic essays written by British and American students. Theresults revealed that many lexical bundles of fixed length identified in a conventional way are fragmentsof longer chunks of text and hence they should not be treated as complete or standalone 4-word lexicalitems. It was also revealed that the application of the Formulex method, where the word sequences aremutually exclusive, helps a researcher filter out overlapping or non-perceptually salient lexical bundlesand, ultimately, specify more precise boundaries of lexical bundles of fixed length.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.29.15327
Filter (signal processing · Lexical item · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Natural language processing · Phraseology · Range (aeronautics · Salient · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · linguistics and terminology studies · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Corpus Linguistics at Work
Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English
As can be seen
Longman grammar of spoken and written English
An Academic Formulas List
Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects
The acquisition of formulaic language by EFL learners
Academic clusters
Transitional probability predicts native and non‐native use of formulaic sequences
If you look at
| Highly cited | No |
|---|