Monsters and Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12885689 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer L Schulz (0009-0007-4453-3705, University of Manitoba, corresponding author), JiHyun Youn (University of Winnipeg) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 411-431 |
| Publication date | 2016-10-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law Culture and the Humanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1743-8721 • E-ISSN: 1743-9752 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1743872116673162 |
| OpenAlex | W2529062326 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
In this article we engage with the writings of feminist scholars Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, whose landmark work The Madwoman in the Attic critiques the image of the female madwoman or monster. We use Gilbert and Gubar’s thesis of the female monster as the primary analytical framework for excavating three variants of female madness as depicted in three films: madness as neurosis using Laws of Attraction; monstrosity as ambition using Michael Clayton; and madness/monstrosity as failed motherhood using I Am Sam. Our goals for this article are to explore the ways in which popular films featuring female lawyers channel the “madwoman/monster” metaphor; trace those characters in terms of neuroses, ambition, and motherhood; and argue for the possibility of reconfiguring the notion of “madwoman” as a valid and meaningful mode of female subjectivity that expands the field of possibilities for women lawyers
Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Literature · Metaphor · Mode (computer interface · Monster · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Subjectivity · Theology · Artificial Intelligence in Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |