Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Drawing hidden figures of disability

Youth and adults with disabilities in Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID12889372
AuthorsMartin J Prince (0000-0003-2888-2394, University of Victoria, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume17
Issue2
Pages227-241
Publication date2021-03-31
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvidence & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-2648 • E-ISSN: 1744-2656
PublisherPolicy Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/174426421x16146827140135
OpenAlexW3140524016
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

Background: While governments draw on survey data to inform policy choices, the design, application, and interpretation of surveys can generate certain images of disability and ignore many others. Aims and objectives: This article draws attention to social circumstances of people with disabilities often unacknowledged in research evidence: hidden figures of disability. Methods: Selected results from the Canadian Survey on Disability are examined with a focus on working-age youth and adults (aged 15 to 64) with a range of disabilities. Findings: Five figures of disability and corresponding conceptual models are identified. These hidden figures of disability are the uncounted, those with needs unsupported, youth in multiple transitions, potential workers, and what may be called ‘the fearful’. Several models of disability are identified intersecting with the evidence. These are the absent citizen, biomedical model and charitable model, social and economic integration model, human rights and full citizenship, and psycho-emotional model of affective disablism and ableism. Discussion: Hidden figures of disability are more than statistical tests and texts; more than calculations derived from quantitative research where people become a data point. The function of drawing hidden figures is to disclose and describe the bodily experiences of people with disabilities in their social positions and structural contexts. Conclusion: We need to see the production of evidence for policy not as painting a portrait but as portraits in the plural, and appreciate not only what is in the frame but also what faces and forms of knowledge get glossed over or brushed aside

Ableism · Citizenship · Disability studies · Geography · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Medical model of disability · Political science · Portrait · Social model of disability · Sociology · Disability Education and Employment · Disability Rights and Representation · Gender Studies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The many faces of disability in evidence for policy and practice

    Carol Rivas, Ikuko Tomomatsu et al.•Evidence & Policy•2021

  • Disability and Society

    Len Barton•Disability and Society•2018

  • Negotiating Psycho-emotional Dimensions of Disability and their Influence on Identity Constructions

    Donna Reeve•Disability & Society•2002

  • Who decides? – transitions from school to adult services for and with young people with severe intellectual disabilities

    Paula Jacobs, Kenneth Macmahon et al.•Disability & Society•2019

  • Putting emotions to work

    Laura Sanmiquel-Molinero, Joan Pujol-Tarrés•Disability & Society•2019

  • About Canada disability rights

    Irene Carter•Disability & Society•2013

  • Disability studies after the ontological turn

    Michael Feely•Disability & Society•2016

  • Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies

    Alan Roulstone, Simo Vehma et al.•Routledge Handbook of Disability…•2019

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae