Effectiveness of Regulatory Sandboxes in Financial Services
A Systematic Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12899682 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yanqing Wang (0000-0002-5961-0482, corresponding author), Zijian Zhou (0000-0002-8530-6660) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Regulation & Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/rego.70129 |
| OpenAlex | W7128398072 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
Regulatory sandboxes have become increasingly prevalent over the past decade. In this paper we systematically review 15 peer‐reviewed studies and 5 gray literature sources (2016–2025) identified through structured searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and regulatory repositories. Treating effectiveness as contested and multidimensional, we combine existing studies to demonstrate when, how, and for whom sandboxes generate benefits and risks. Three patterns emerge. First, the clearest gains are ecosystem spillovers: once a sector has its first sandbox entrant, funding for non‐participating firms often rises, consistent with signaling and information diffusion. Second, direct firm‐level funding advantages largely fade after accounting for staggered adoption, with positive effects concentrated in smaller firms. Third, system‐level impacts depend on context, varying with supervisory capacity, complementary policies, and wider pro‐innovation reform bundles. Overall, the evidence base is small, UK‐centric, and methodologically heterogeneous, so findings should be read as indicative. We conclude with evaluation implications for regulators
Arbitrage · Financial regulation · Financial sector · Financial services · Grey literature · Sandbox (software development · Financial Reporting and XBRL · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Securities Regulation and Market Practices
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research
How to Do a Systematic Review
Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Shades of Grey
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration
Literature review as a research methodology
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects
Exploring how social interactions influence regulators and innovators
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Mapping the relationship between regulation and innovation from an interdisciplinary perspective
Governing Fintech and Fintech as Governance
Women's Career Success in the Financial Services Industry
Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions
The many uses of regulatory impact assessment
Regulatory reform in the era of new technological development
Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies
Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products
Trust in context
European artificial intelligence “trusted throughout the world
Caught in quicksand? Compliance and legitimacy challenges in using regulatory sandboxes to manage emerging technologies
The problem of regulatory arbitrage
Global Experimentalist Governance
Open for business
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |