Relational Epistemology, Immediacy, and Conservation

Or, What Do the Nayaka Try to Conserve

Bibliographic Data

ID12901093
AuthorsNurit Bird‐david (University of Haifa, corresponding author), Danny Naveh (University of Haifa)
Year2008
Volume2
Issue1
Pages55-73
Publication date2008-04-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1749-4907 • E-ISSN: 1749-4915
PublisherEquinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1558/jsrnc.v2i1.55
OpenAlexW2028677621
LanguageEN
Citations received27

In this paper we ask whether and in what way Animism relates to conservation, with focus on one group, the Nayaka of South India. We argue that in order to pursue this question one must first recognize the immediate quality of Nayaka Animism as well as some important aspects in their relational epistemology (Bird-David 1999a, 2006). Our analysis shows that Nayaka are not committed to conserve their environment. Their concern lies mainly with keeping good relations with specific co-dwellers in the shared environment in ways and for reasons which we explore in the paper. This concern has indeed some conservationist effects, but as a byproduct. Our analysis also shows a valuable way-of-knowing, as much as the nowadays appreciated ‘indigenous knowledge’. These arguments are supported by Nayaka ethnography, and are further clarified by a preliminary heuristic comparison between the model which can be identified from the ethnography and the model which informs an ambitious international program for biodiversity conservation which is implemented in the Nilgiris of South India, where the Nayaka live

Animism · Business · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethnography · Immediacy · Indigenous · Order (exchange · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Philosophy · Primate Behavior and Ecology · Ecology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub