Commentary on ‘Interprofessional Ethics
A Developing Field?’—A Response to Banks et al . (2010)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12902243 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Madeline H Schmitt (corresponding author), Anne Stewart (0000-0001-6560-2553) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-78 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethics and Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1749-6535 • E-ISSN: 1749-6543 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17496535.2011.546181 |
| OpenAlex | W2019801833 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
In this commentary on a previous Ethics and Social Welfare publication, the authors argue that inclusive and expansive dialogue about interprofessional ethics is more a matter of ‘‘revitalizing’’ traditional professional ethics than developing a new field. The dialogue will be most productive of care improvements if it incorporates the service user, includes both health and social care professions, and occurs across countries
Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Expansive · Field (mathematics · Health care · Political science · Public relations · Social Welfare · Sociology · Welfare · Engineering · Ethics in medical practice · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Law · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Philosophy · Social Work
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |