Pseudo-Media Disinformation Patterns
Polarised Discourse, Clickbait and Twisted Journalistic Mimicry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12909124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dolors Palau-Sampio (0000-0001-9051-0239, Universitat de València, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 2140-2158 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2022.2126992 |
| OpenAlex | W4306252319 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 56 |
Information disorder involves wide-ranging content that challenges democratic rules and social harmony. Pseudo-media that relies on conspiracy theories and misleading versions of the social reality contribute to feeding the disinformation ecosystem by reinforcing biased messages with expressive patterns and polarising practices. This article focuses on the content published (N = 1,396) by seven far-right wing Spanish pseudo-media. Based on qualitative and quantitative methods, it analyses headlines, types of text and sources, as well as the distortion strategies of journalistic conventions. Results show that the emotional component is expressed by means of polarised headlines that rely on clickbait to gain attention and build a particular jargon, exacerbated by disinformation and populist practices. The absolute dependence of conspicuous headlines is evidenced by the limited resources of pseudo-media, whose production lies in a mix of opinion text and the processing of online content. Plagiarism from mainstream—mainly conservative—media, social networks and website siblings fuel these outlets that play the role of the ambiguity, mimicking journalistic conventions and mocking them by means of disinformation practices, with a particular focus on reframing social issues, progressive policies and measures to manage the pandemic
Disinformation · Jargon · Linguistics · Mainstream · Media studies · Persuasion · Political science · Slang · Social media · Sociology · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Alternative Epistemologies as Distinguishing Features of Right-Wing and Left-Wing Media in the United States
Cost-cutting and profit-maximizing. The impact of company decision-makers on immigration coverage
Actors of Disinformation
Publicidad programática y desinformación en España. El rol de marcas y plataformas AdTech en pseudomedios
This is how to recognize conspiracy theory–based alternative news media
Fact-Checkers on the Fringe
Spreading False Content in Political Campaigns
YouTube and Religion during Covid-19
The researcher’s bias in fake news automatic detection
Disinformation Studies
Look at this! Radical right-wing populist information sharing practices on Twitter in Portugal, Spain, and Brazil
On Psyop Realism
Cumulative disinformation through citation
Future of disinformation studies
Estrategias de polarización discursiva de los medios digitales (ultra)conservadores españoles en noticias sobre feminismo
Estrategias discursivas y marcas lingüísticas en los titulares clickbait
Son los jóvenes la raíz del auge de la misoginia en España? Sesgos y problemas en la cobertura mediática de la Manosfera y el antifeminismo español
Clickbait Contagion in International Quality Media
Fuelling climate change disinformation
Activistas, políticos y medios de comunicación
Deterioro publicitario, institucional y de audiencias
The Racialisation of Rape
A Shift Amid the Transition
Beyond Breitbart
The affective politics of the “post-truth” era
The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research
Reference press metamorphosis in the digital context
Tackling Disinformation and Infodemics Demands Media Policy Changes
Between Journalistic and Movement Logic
Trust in Social Media
Computational Propaganda
The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics
Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Defining “Fake News”
Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics
Pseudo-Media Sites, Polarization, and Pandemic Skepticism in Spain
Untrustworthy News and the Media as “Enemy of the People?” How a Populist Worldview Shapes Recipients’ Attitudes toward the Media
How do Danish Right-wing Alternative Media Position Themselves Against the Mainstream? Advancing the Study of Alternative Media Structure and Content
Challenging Journalistic Authority
Fake News as Discursive Integration
Percepciones sobre medios de comunicación y desinformación
Desórdenes informativos
Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article
Conspiracy Theories
Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions
Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media
The disinformation order
After the post-public sphere
Rethinking journalism standards in the era of post-truth politics
The mediated construction of reality
Post-truth politics and the social sciences
Spain
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy
The Impact of Political Sophistication and Motivated Reasoning on Misinformation
All the News That’s Fit to Click
Disinformation as Political Communication
Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co
Paradoxical populism
Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon
The Populist Zeitgeist
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don't
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Pseudo-Information, Media, Publics, and the Failing Marketplace of Ideas
Click bait
The weaponization of language
Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |