Experts or Advocates
Shifting Roles of Central Sources Used by Journalists in News Stories
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12909189 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bo Laursen (0000-0002-0957-7637, Aarhus University), N Leila Trapp (0000-0003-3301-6634, Aarhus University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-18 |
| Publication date | 2019-11-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2019.1695537 |
| OpenAlex | W2989630707 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 41 |
This study empirically examines suspected shifts in journalist practices in western democracies regarding the granting of expert, vis-á-vis advocate, roles to central social actor types used as sources in news stories: interest groups, think tanks, and independent university researchers. The theoretical foundation includes well-established concepts, e.g., the objectivity norm; credibility; expertise; advocacy, and reporting biases. A characterization of the actor types indicates that independent researchers are prototypical experts, while interest groups and think tanks must strive to earn credibility due to ideological commitments. An analysis of Danish news stories indicates that the expert-advocate distinction is indeed blurring, including changes in journalists’ market for expertise. Of the three actors, think tanks are most frequently cast as experts, due to persistent reference to their own research. Interest groups, while mostly advocating by expressing what they find (un)desirable, rarely refer to their own research. Independent researchers refer least often to their research, and more frequently advocate. Proposed explanations for shifting roles include the professionalization of interest groups; the growing pervasiveness of think tanks; and the proliferation of political undertones in university research. The discussion ends with a call for even sharper critical skills amongst journalists and audiences, in order to skillfully navigate these remarkable shifts
Credibility · Epistemology · Ideology · Journalism · Media studies · Norm (philosophy · Objectivity (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Professionalization · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics
Inferential causal explanatory journalism. A science-based bridge between outcome and cause in journalism
The “Hierarchy of Credibility” among Economic Experts
Sourcing Practice in Local Media
Look me in the eyes
Toimittajien kokema lobbaus suomalaisessa politiikan uutisoinnissa
Talouden asiantuntijoiden uskottavuuden hierarkia suomalaisten talous- ja politiikan toimittajien silmin
Mein Text, meine Meinung, meine Wissenschaftlerin? Eine qualitative Untersuchung zur Nutzung von Wissenschaftler*innen als opportune Zeugen
Effects of online incivility and emotions toward in-groups on cross-cutting attention and political participation
The Impact of Expert Opinions in Covid-19 News Coverage on Vaccination During the Fifth Outbreak in Hong Kong
When love wins
Colaboración entre el periodismo y la Academia
An Examination of Expertise, Caring and Salient Value Similarity as Source Factors that Garner Support for Advocated Climate Policies
“We Need to Build Carbon-Neutral Houses” – Discourses of Responsible Expertise in Finnish Professional Media
The Strategic Value of Data Journalism
Seeking the Legitimation of Mainstream Journalism
It’s Just as Whitewashed as Ever”
A Misinformation Insurrection
Do think tanks generate media attention on issues they care about? Mediating internal expertise and prevailing governmental agendas
News media coverage of extreme risk protection order policies surrounding the Parkland shooting
Sustainability and Environmental Communities of Practice’s Impact on News Content Diversity
Remediating Authority
The mediatization of the economist profession
Public and Private Think Tank Visibility in the Danish Parliament and Media
Outside Lobbying
Experts in the Mass Media
The American Heritage dictionary of the English language.
Making it to the News. Interest Groups in the Danish Media
Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems
Journalism and Expertise
Defining Interests
Goodwill
Political news journalism
The Politics of Expertise in Congress and the News Media
Universities and the public recognition of expertise
News and News Sources
The Myth of the Outside Strategy
Going Public in the European Union
Conceptualizing Mediatization
Experts and the Operational Bias of Television News
Journalists and Their Sources
The Evolution of Objective and Interpretative Journalism in the Western Press
Verification as a Strategic Ritual
Look Who's Talking
Commentators on daily news or communicators of scholarly achievements? The role of researchers in Danish news media
Sourcing homelessness
A reality check
Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources
Pressure Politics
Voice and Access
Interest groups in the media
Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in fiveEuropean countries
Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change
Whose Side Are We On
Objectivity as Strategic Ritual
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |