Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Toward Sociology of Metaethics

The Effects of Sociopsychological and Demographic Factors on Folk Moral Objectivism (in a Non‐Western Context)

Bibliographic Data

ID12913071
AuthorsA T Bykov (National Research University Higher School of Economics, corresponding author), Andrey Bykov (0000-0003-4282-1985, HSE University Moscow Russia), Vlada Mikhaleva (National Research University Higher School of Economics)
Year2026
Volume20
Issue3
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1751-9020 • E-ISSN: 1751-9020
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/soc4.70178
OpenAlexW7134176009
LanguageEN
References cited46

Experimental philosophers have been long addressing the problem of folk metaethics, that is, laypeople's ideas about the nature of moral judgments, focusing especially on the question of whether such judgments are believed to represent some objective truth. While the results of their experiments, mostly conducted on small Western samples, suggest that certain personal and social factors might affect people's perception of moral claims as more or less objective, there is a lack of such studies in more diverse and non‐Western cultural contexts. In this article, we examine the effects of several social and sociopsychological factors—such as age, gender, education, religiosity, political views, and moral foundations—on folk moral objectivism drawing on a large heterogeneous sample from Russia. Although some of our hypotheses found limited support, our overall results question the universality of the previous findings. We conclude by discussing the future of the sociology of metaethics as a distinctive research program in the context of our results

Affect (linguistics · Context (archaeology · History of sociology · Morality · Objectivism · Perception · Politics · Universality (dynamical systems · Cultural Differences and Values · Ethics in Business and Education · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • What’s New and What’s Old about the New Sociology of Morality

    Gabriel Abend•Handbook of the sociology of…•2010

  • Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics

    Open Access•David O Brink•Moral Realism and the Foundations…•1989

  • The psychology of meta-ethics

    Open Access•Geoffrey P Goodwin, John M Darley•Cognition•2008

  • Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior

    Open Access•Paul K Piff, Daniel M Stancato et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Moral Foundations Theory

    J Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al.•Advances in Experimental Social…•2013

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds

    Edouard Machery•Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds•2017

  • Beyond objectivism

    Taylor Davis•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • The irrationality of folk metaethics

    Ross Colebrook•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler, J C Wright•Inquiry•2023

  • Relativism or tolerance? Defining, assessing, connecting, and distinguishing two moral personality features with prominent roles in modern societies

    Open Access•Lauren Collier‐Spruel, Ashley Hawkins et al.•Journal of Personality•2019

  • Mapping morality with a compass

    Open Access•Oliver Scott Curry, Matthew Jones Chesters et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2019

  • Rediscovering the Moral

    Open Access•Andrey Bykov•Sociology•2019

  • Folk moral objectivism and its measurement

    Open Access•Lieuwe Zijlstra•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019

  • Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others

    Open Access•Geoffrey P Goodwin, John M Darley•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • Moral objectivism and a punishing God

    Open Access•Hagop Sarkissian, Mark Phelan•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • Without God, everything is permitted? The reciprocal influence of religious and meta-ethical beliefs

    Open Access•Ozlem Yilmaz, Onurcan Yilmaz et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015

  • Metaethics and the conceptual ethics of normativity

    Open Access•Tristram Mcpherson, Dudley Plunkett et al.•Inquiry•2021

  • Within- and Between-Country Value Diversity in Europe

    Open Access•Vladimir Magun, Владимир Самуилович Магун et al.•European Sociological Review•2016

  • Handbook of the Sociology of Morality

    Steven Hitlin, Vaisey et al.•Handbook of the sociology of…•2010

  • Empirical research on folk moral objectivism

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler, J C Wright•Philosophy Compass•2019

  • Morality and politics

    Open Access•Andrew Miles, Vaisey et al.•Social Science Research•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae