Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How gender configurations and team processes characterize successful entrepreneurial teams

Bibliographic Data

ID12927809
AuthorsAlessio Castello (0000-0003-3888-8570, International University of Monaco, corresponding author), Francis Bidault (0000-0003-3522-1252, European School of Management and Technology), Karine Raïes (0000-0003-4519-6820, École de management de Lyon)
Year2025
Volume18
Issue1
Pages59-85
Publication date2025-03-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1756-6266 • E-ISSN: 1756-6274
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/ijge-03-2024-0106
OpenAlexW4408087688
LanguageEN
References cited107

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the combined effect of gender, trust, leadership style and team integration on entrepreneurial team performance. Through an integrated analysis of gender composition and team processes, we enhance the understanding of the drivers of new venture teams’ performance. Design/methodology/approach We use data collected from multi-player startup simulations involving 52 teams of masters-level students across two countries. We used the fsQCA methodology to perform a configurational analysis of different team composition and processes. This innovative application of the methodology allows us to identify new combinations of gender diversity and team processes that improve team performance. Findings Teams with higher proportions of women who shared leadership were more profitable in several configurations, demonstrating the importance of the relationship between gender and leadership models on performance. Shared leadership resulted in high levels of trust and sense of control, which increased team effectiveness and performance. We found that combining trust with shared leadership consistently resulted in successful positive outcomes, although not all successful teams included these attributes. Originality/value Our findings contribute to renewing the frame of research on new venture team performance that has long revolved around the leadership-cohesion-alignment (LCA) triangle. Although the LCA paradigm certainly improved our understanding of new venture success, it provided only a partial understanding of the organizational and relational context. It offered a restricted view of the sources of cohesion and alignment. We believe that our approach to data analysis based on the fsQCA method allowed us to extend our understanding of the determinants of entrepreneurial team performance

Business · Entrepreneurship · Political science · Sociology · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Family Business Performance and Succession · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Psychology

  • Between Complexity and Parsimony

    C C Ragin, J Sonnett•Vergleichen in der Politikwissensch…•2005

  • Students as Experimental Participants

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Cindy D Kam•Cambridge Handbook of Experimental…•2011

  • Sex and Gender Equity in Research

    Open Access•Shirin Heidari, Thomas F Babor et al.•Research Integrity and Peer Review•2016

  • A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations

    Peer C Fiss•Academy of Management Review•2007

  • Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆

    Open Access•Renée B Adams, Daniel Ferreira•Journal of Financial Economics•2009

  • CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries

    Open Access•Thomas Greckhamer•Strategic Management Journal•2016

  • Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation

    Open Access•Cristian L Dezsö, David Gaddis Ross•Strategic Management Journal•2012

  • Trust and team performance

    Bart De Jong, Kurt T Dirks et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2016

  • Gender and Culture

    Rachel Croson, Nancy R Buchan et al.•American Economic Review•1999

  • An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

    F David Schoorman, Robert C Mayer et al.•Academy of Management Review•2007

  • Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five

    Open Access•Yanna J Weisberg, Colin G Deyoung et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2011

  • A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations

    Open Access•Lauren D’innocenzo, John E Mathieu et al.•Journal of Management•2016

  • New Venture Teams

    Open Access•Anthony C Klotz, Keith M Hmieleski et al.•Journal of Management•2014

  • Gender differences in firm performance

    Open Access•Alicia Robb, Alicia M Robb et al.•Journal of Business Venturing•2012

  • Not So Different After All

    Denise M Rousseau, Sim B Sitkin et al.•Academy of Management Review•1998

  • An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

    Robert C Mayer, Roger C Mayer et al.•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • Teammate conscientiousness diversity depletes team cohesion

    Open Access•Qing Zheng, Qisong Zheng et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis

    Open Access•Thomas Greckhamer, Santi Furnari et al.•Strategic Organization•2018

  • Chipping away at the Glass Ceiling

    David A Matsa, Anna R Miller et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance

    Open Access•Kevin Campbell, Antonio Mínguez‐Vera et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2007

  • The paradox of postheroic leadership

    Open Access•Joyce K Fletcher•The Leadership Quarterly•2004

  • Women Directors on Corporate Boards

    Open Access•Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2011

  • Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Carsten Q Schneider, Claudius Wagemann•Set-Theoretic Methods for the…•2012

  • Social Interaction

    Open Access•Thomas Lechler•Small Business Economics•2001

  • How female entrepreneurs build strong business relationships

    Open Access•Christina Constantinidis•International Journal of Gender…•2021

  • Entrepreneurial intentions and gender

    Open Access•Shahrokh Nikou, Malin Brännback et al.•International Journal of Gender…•2019

  • Gender diversity in the board, women’s leadership and business performance

    Open Access•Jorge Moreno-Gómez, Esteban Lafuente et al.•Gender in Management An…•2018

  • When is female leadership an advantage? Coordination requirements, team cohesion, and team interaction norms

    Open Access•Corinne Post•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2015

  • Shared cognition in top management teams

    Open Access•Michael D Ensley, Craig L Pearce•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2001

  • The role of gender in team collaboration and performance

    Open Access•Julia B Bear, Anita Williams Woolley•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2011

  • The Leadership Styles of Women and Men

    Open Access•Alice H Eagly, Mary C Johannesen‐Schmidt•Journal of Social Issues•2001

  • Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams

    Open Access•Benoit A Aubert, Barbara L Kelsey•Small Group Behavior•2003

  • Ecofeminism Revisited

    Greta Gaard•Feminist formations•2011

  • Gender Differences in Preferences

    Rachel Croson, Uri Gneezy•Journal of Economic Literature•2009

  • Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles

    Alice H Eagly, Mary C Johannesen-Schmidt et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • Perceived Cohesion

    K A Bollen, Rick H Hoyle•Social Forces•1990

  • Beyond the Facts

    Open Access•Alrik Thiem•Sociological Methods & Research•2022

  • Model Ambiguities in Configurational Comparative Research

    Open Access•Michael Baumgartner, Alrik Thiem•Sociological Methods & Research•2017

  • On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research

    J Lynch, John G Lynch Jr et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1982

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae