Ambitious for change? A critical appraisal of the Canadian indicator framework of the sustainable development goals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12930230 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tracy A Smith-Carrier (0000-0002-5806-8943, Royal Roads University, corresponding author), Jacqueline On (Western University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 204-231 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-07 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Rights Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-9619 • E-ISSN: 1757-9627 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jhuman/huac049 |
| OpenAlex | W4313729871 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
This article explores the indicators and targets identified in the Canadian Indicator Framework, a localization of the UN Sustainable Development Goals for the country of Canada. Applying a critical theoretical lens and a human rights approach, the authors explore each of the ‘ambitions’ proposed by the federal government and assess their suitability in meeting the magnitude of transformative change that will be necessary to meet the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In considering each of the Canadian ambitions proposed to realize Sustainable Development Goals 1 to 17, and the framework as a whole, the authors conclude that a business-as-usual stance has been applied. Many of the Canadian ambitions have ‘no specific target’ identified, offering no baseline measures or concrete standards from which to benchmark and monitor progress. The ones that do are not tremendously transformative, leading to a framework that does not present a dramatic departure from existing policy and practice arrangements. The character of the Canadian ambitions to the Sustainable Development Goals are revealed, not as concrete change strategies, but as mere aspirations, albeit more for the status quo than for transformational action. To translate the Canadian ambitions into actions, human rights must be infused into the Canadian Indicator Framework, and these must be substantive, de facto, rights—rights that people can actually claim, and hold state actors accountable to
Action (physics · Government (linguistics · Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · State (computer science · Status quo · Sustainable development · Transformational leadership · Transformative learning · Computer Science · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Human Rights and Development · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy · Law · Public Administration
Food Bank Nations
From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals
Social determinants of health inequalities
Changing climates in a blue economy
Regulating the Blue Economy? Challenges to an effective Canadian aquaculture act
A human rights approach
‘Food is a Right … Nobody Should Be Starving on Our Streets’
The (charitable) pantry is bare’
Whose input counts? Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization
An “Opportunity” for Policy Recycling? A Critical Analysis of the Canadian Poverty Reduction Strategy
Inclusive sustainable development
Scaling up forest landscape restoration in Canada in an era of cumulative effects and climate change
The Sustainable Development Goals and human rights
Accountability for the Sustainable Development Goals
Gender Equality through a Neoliberal Lens
Realising our (neoliberal) potential? A critical discourse analysis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy in Ontario, Canada
The impact of Covid-19 on the eradication of poverty
Providing Equality
Assessing the sustainable development goals from a human rights perspective
Knowledge and Politics in Setting and Measuring the SDGs
| Highly cited | No |
|---|