Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Providing Equality

Substantive Equality and the Positive Duty to Provide

Bibliographic Data

ID6222148
AuthorsSandra Fredman (0000-0002-4132-1164, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume21
Issue2
Pages163-190
Publication date2005-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSouth African Journal on Human Rights (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0258-7203 • E-ISSN: 1996-2126
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19962126.2005.11865132
OpenAlexW37246419
LanguageEN
Citations received10

One of the key insights of substantive equality is the recognition that it is not colour, gender or some other group characteristic per se which is at issue, but the attendant disadvantage. This focus on disadvantage means that, for substantive equality to be effective, it should include a positive duty to provide. This in turn moves the anti-discrimination agenda onto the uncertain frontier between policy and law. This poses a difficult set of challenges for judges. The political arena is frequently seen as the primary space for developing the positive duty to provide; a space which judges are reluctant to invade. In some jurisdictions the result has been a definition of substantive equality which defers to the state by protecting it from having to justify distributive decisions. On the other hand, the role of reasoned explanation is considerably enhanced when courts are dealing with socio-economic rights. It is argued that the way forward is not judicial deference but judicial intervention which supports rather than usurps the decision-making powers of elected representatives. This is achieved by insisting on reasoned justification for distributive decisions burdening or excluding disadvantaged groups. In this way courts contribute to the democratic process, both by strengthening accountability and by ensuring that political deliberation includes those who would otherwise be silenced in the political arena

Duty · Gender equality · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Human Rights and Development · Law

  • Ensuring human rights for persons with intellectual disabilities

    Kjersti Skarstad•The International Journal of…•2018

  • Employment equity and elimination of discrimination

    Willene Holness•Agenda•2016

  • Realizing South African Children'S Basic Socio-Economic Claims Against Parents And The State

    Elsje Bonthuys•International Journal of Law…•2008

  • Ambitious for change? A critical appraisal of the Canadian indicator framework of the sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Tracy A Smith-Carrier, Jacqueline On•Journal of Human Rights Practice•2023

  • Transformative equality

    Open Access•Robyn White, Robyn M White et al.•African Journal of Disability•2020

  • Navigating through the substantive equality doctrine

    Open Access•Milica V Matijević•Pravni zapisi•2024

  • Bringing It All Together

    Open Access•Tracy A Smith-Carrier, Kathleen Manion•Human Rights Review•2022

  • Re-Articulating Abortion Rights and/as Reproductive Health Justice Post-Dobbs

    Open Access•Leifa Mayers•Feminist Legal Studies•2026

  • Sujeito de direito migrante

    Open Access•Fernando Cesar Mendes Barbosa, José Antônio Peres Gediel•Revista Direito e Práxis•2023

  • Gender and social assistance in the first decade of democracy

    Beth Goldblatt•Politikon•2005

Citations per year0.48
Citation span2005 - 2026 (22)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae