Responsibility to Protect
Time to Reassess
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12930341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eileen F Babbitt (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 431-435 |
| Publication date | 2017-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Rights Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-9619 • E-ISSN: 1757-9627 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jhuman/hux024 |
| OpenAlex | W2772806328 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This policy note discusses the hopes and fears generated by the ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) agenda, as strongly influenced by the intervention in Libya and lack thereof in Syria. Based on that analysis, it offers a prescription for R2P moving forward, suggesting that it move away from coercive intervention to a strategy of diplomacy and prevention
Diplomacy · Human rights · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Responsibility to Protect · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Peacebuilding and International Security · Psychology · Law · Public Administration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |