Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On Power and Norms

Libya, Syria and the Responsibility to Protect

Bibliographic Data

ID12960769
AuthorsNathalie Tocci (0000-0002-2097-0595, Istituto Affari Internazionali, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume8
Issue1
Pages51-75
Publication date2016-02-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1875984x-00801004
OpenAlexW2313238134
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited6

In 2011 the United Nations Security Council legitimized a no-fly zone over Libya under the normative rubric of the ‘responsibility to protect’. As the Libya intervention gained steam, another uprising broke out in Syria. In contrast to Libya, discord between Western actors and emerging powers underpinned standstill at the Council. What explains such radically different outcomes? The international responses to the crises in Libya and Syria may look like evidence of a tipping point in the international system which is undergoing a profound power shift. And yet the two crises unfolded almost in parallel. This article argues that while a systemic understanding of power cannot capture the dynamics underpinning the Libyan and Syrian crises, power is crucial in explaining their very different outcomes. While not revealing a tipping point in the international system from the ‘West’ to the ‘Rest’, a situated and multifaceted analysis of power reveals that both Western and brics countries played key roles in determining the overall international responses to both crises and in so doing are shaping the ongoing normative debate over the ‘Responsibility to Protect’

Development economics · Economics · Human rights · Humanitarian intervention · International law · International relations · Law and economics · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Responsibility to Protect · Rubric · Sociology · Tipping point (physics · Underpinning · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security

  • Responsibility to Protect

    Eileen F Babbitt•Journal of Human Rights Practice•2017

  • Ironclad US commitment to Nato? From Nato expansion to the Ukraine crisis

    Open Access•Yanan Song•Cogent Social Sciences•2024

  • Paz útil, paz posible

    Open Access•Lluc Torrella Llauger•Revista de Estudios Internacionales…•2025

  • The Moral Untouchability of the Responsibility to Protect

    Christopher Hobson•Journal of Intervention and…•2022

  • Mediating among Mediators

    Timea Spitka•International Negotiation•2018

  • The Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Adrian Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson et al.•Global Responsibility to Protect•2023

  • India and the responsibility to protect

    Bjorn Moller•Third World Quarterly•2017

  • The Obama Administration

    Open Access•Ofira Seliktar•Navigating Iran•2012

  • The United States and the Responsibility to Protect

    Theresa Reinold•Global Responsibility to Protect•2011

  • Libya and the Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Alex J Bellamy•Ethics & International Affairs•2011

  • R2P after Libya and Syria

    Ramesh Thakur•The Washington Quarterly•2013

  • Structural power

    Open Access•Stefano Guzzini•International Organization•1993

  • The concept of power

    Open Access•Robert A Dahl•Systems Research and Behavioral…•2007

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,78
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae