Negotiating Politics and Culture
The Utility of Human Rights for Activist Organizing in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12930529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amy Finnegan (0000-0003-4940-6581, Boston College), A C Finnegan, Adam P Saltsman (0000-0002-1991-3091, Boston College), Stephanie White (0009-0005-0027-7426, Boston College, corresponding author), S K White |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 307-333 |
| Publication date | 2010-10-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Rights Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-9619 • E-ISSN: 1757-9627 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jhuman/huq009 |
| OpenAlex | W2120975154 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 11 |
Historically, culturally, and politically, the United States has maintained an ambivalent relationship with the discourse of international human rights. While integral to its codification as transnational principle and law, the United States has not moved significantly toward ratification of human rights conventions, nor has the language of human rights been widespread in US society. Within the context of this complicated relationship, this article explores how US activists conceptualize, relate to, and utilize the human rights framework. In addressing this question, this article examines activists' organizational framing choices, the factors that influence them, and the implications of these choices for the future of human rights organizing in the context of US urban activism. Based on 51 interviews across 42 organizations, this research finds that activists contend with substantial political obstacles, including the US government's perceived exploitations of the human rights framework. Far more pervasive among respondents, however, is the notion that it is the cultural barriers that prevent widespread social movement mobilization under the banner of human rights language. Because of this, respondents point to grassroots approaches as a potential avenue for future human rights organizing in the US context. Relying on the findings from these interviews, this article considers social movement strategy, history, and public perception as central factors underlying activist conceptions of the utility of a human rights discourse to their work
Human rights · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Political Conflict and Governance · Religion, Society, and Development · Law · Public Administration
Vermont and Healthcare Reform Organizing
Learning by Doing
Exceptional and Necessary
Mapping perceptions of human rights and cultivating Boston as a human rights city
The paradox of framing water as a human right in the United States
Powers of Reach
De la injusticia a los derechos
William A. Gamson and His Legacy for Academia and Social Movements
Responding to Globalization and Urban Conflict
Making History
Constructing Social Movement Actorhood
Linking local and global feminist advocacy
Immigrant Rights Are Human Rights
Income Rights, Mothers' Rights, or Workers' Rights? Collective Action Frames, Organizational Ideologies, and the American Welfare Rights Movement
Silence, Death, and the Invisible Enemy
Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism
Between the State and the Market
Framing Processes and Social Movements
Community, Movement, Organization
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,71 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2022 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |