Alternative pedagogy of learning and teaching Anthropology
Process and legitimisation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12930642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Celayne Heaton‐Shrestha (0000-0002-6021-5877, University of Sussex, corresponding author), Tomoko Kurihara (Universidad de Londres), Jakob Rigi (University of London) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 1970-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropology Matters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1758-6453 • E-ISSN: 1758-6453 |
| Publisher | NomadIT (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22582/am.v1i1.152 |
| OpenAlex | W1642223689 |
| Language | EN |
This paper is a first attempt at presenting a multi-authored ethnography of e@tm in its second year. It is open to further elaboration through the contributions of readers. It aims to investigate the contradictions inherent in our own practice, as subalterns within an academic institution attempting to create a space for the production of alternative but equally legitimate knowledges. The notions of communitas, and creativity or innovation which the formation of communitas supports, have been used in the past to describe this seminar, but as practices, these can in some instances sit uneasily together. Here their coexistence is found to be rendered problematic through the requirements of legitimisation of the seminar and the form this process takes
Aesthetics · Communitas · Creativity · Elaboration · Epistemology · Ethnography · Humanities · Institution · Liminality · Linguistics · Pedagogy · Process (computing · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Computer Science · Digital Education and Society · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |