Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Digital health literacy and the ethics of information access

A systematic review of global trends, equity challenges and policy responses

Bibliographic Data

ID12935945
AuthorsFarooq Mubarak (0000-0003-3305-8818, University of Turku Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Information Systems Science Unit, Turku School of Economics, , Turku, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-30
Publication date2026-02-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1758-8871 • E-ISSN: 1477-996X
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/jices-08-2025-0212
OpenAlexW7128742153
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited63

Purpose Digital health literacy has emerged as a critical determinant of equitable healthcare delivery in the information society. This study aims to examine evolving trends, thematic patterns and ethical considerations, with a focus on global policy responses and technological developments in 2023–2025. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Seventy-two studies published between 2015 and 2025 (with a small number of earlier studies retained due to their continued conceptual and ethical relevance) were selected through database searches (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and manual reference checks. Data were extracted and synthesised thematically, integrating recent policy documents and conceptual analyses relevant to ethics and equity. Findings Five dominant themes emerged: access and infrastructure inequities; misinformation and infodemic management; usability and user-centred design; health data poverty; and ethical governance. While digital health tools proliferated globally, disparities in access, representation and trust remain significant. Developments from 2023 to 2025 (e.g. artificial intelligence-driven health chatbots, TikTok-based health campaigns and updated World Health Organization infodemic guidelines) not only offer opportunities but also introduce new risks. Research limitations/implications The findings position digital health literacy as a core ethical construct within information systems and health policy scholarship, extending digital divide theory beyond access and skills to include justice, autonomy and data representation. This reframing underscores the need to integrate ethical governance and power asymmetries into models of digital health adoption. Practical implications Policymakers and health system designers should embed equity-by-design principles into digital health initiatives, prioritising inclusive usability, misinformation mitigation and representative data practices. Co-ordinated regulatory frameworks and targeted literacy interventions are essential to ensure emerging digital health technologies reduce, rather than reproduce, health inequalities. Originality/value This systematic review contributes to the discourse on information ethics in healthcare by explicitly linking digital health literacy to principles of justice, autonomy and beneficence. It offers a comprehensive synthesis that is policy-oriented, globally comparative and grounded in the latest literature

Cognitive reframing · Digital health · Empowerment · Global health · Health care · Health equity · Health literacy · Information ethics · Usability · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Health Policy

  • Understanding factors shaping consumption intention of natural sweeteners

    Harmanjit Singh, Diksha Raj et al.•British Food Journal•2026

  • Public Health and Online Misinformation

    Open Access•Briony Swire-Thompson, David Lazer•Annual Review of Public Health•2020

  • eHealth Literacy

    Open Access•Efrat Neter, Esther Brainin•Journal of Medical Internet…•2012

  • Machine learning in medicine

    Open Access•Effy Vayena, Alessandro Blasimme et al.•PLoS Medicine•2018

  • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

    Open Access•James Thomas, Angela Harden•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2008

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•PLoS Medicine•2009

  • Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations

    Open Access•Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers et al.•Science•2019

  • How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking

    Open Access•Folco Panizza, Piero Ronzani et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers

    Quan Nha Hong, Sergi Fàbregue et al.•Education for Information•2018

  • Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics

    Open Access•Luciano Floridi•Philosophy & Technology•2019

  • Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage

    Open Access•Megan Arthur, Rana Saha et al.•Journal of Global Health•2023

  • Digital health literacy and associated factors among internet users from China

    Open Access•Bing-Yue Zhao, Long Huang et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Helpful or harmful? Navigating the impact of social media influencers’ health advice

    Open Access•Jaroslava Kaňková, A Binder et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • The commodification of patient opinion

    Open Access•D Lupton•Sociology of Health & Illness•2014

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae