Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Watched men and phallus-wielding women

Aubrey Beardsley’s reception of Juvenal’s Sixth Satire

Bibliographic Data

ID12936470
AuthorsEmily Waller Singeisen (0009-0008-5093-3171, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume17
Issue1
Pages43-63
Publication date2024-11-11
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueClassical Receptions Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1759-5134 • E-ISSN: 1759-5142
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/crj/clae014
OpenAlexW4404230943
LanguageEN
References cited18

In 1896, Aubrey Beardsley, the controversial poster child for the Decadent movement in Britain, set to work on a collection of drawings inspired by Juvenal’s Sixth Satire. The resultant works — which depict Bathyllus dancing, Messalina returning unsatisfied from the baths, an ‘impatient adulterer’ spying on his mistress, and a final image (not found in the ancient text) of Juvenal whipping a woman — are composed in Beardsley’s iconic style of stark black lines against a white page, simple yet grotesquely erotic. In both the passages that Beardsley selected to represent and his subversive and gender-bending representations, Beardsley exploits the text’s latent homoeroticism, skewers the speaker’s acerbic misogyny, and inverts late antique — and, by extension, Victorian — sexual power structures. While men are depicted as the (knowing or unknowing) subjects of the gaze, women are represented as defiant, returning and refusing the subjection of patriarchal power structures. This paper explores the ways in which Beardsley’s illustrations represent his ‘uncooperative reading’ of the text, wherein Juvenal’s monstrous, dominant women are cast as the heroines of his decadent, grotesque fantasy

Art · Art history · Literature · Phallus (fungus · Sociology · Cultural History and Identity Formation · Historical Art and Culture Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Gender Studies

  • A commentary on the satires of Juvenal

    E Courtney•A commentary on the satires of…•1980

  • The libidinal rhetoric of satire

    Open Access•Erik Gunderson•The Cambridge Companion to Roman…•2005

  • Wilde’s Salomé and the Ambiguous Fetish

    Open Access•Amanda Fernbach•Victorian Literature and Culture•2001

  • Juvenal—Misogynist or Misogamist

    Open Access•Susanna H Braund•The Journal of Roman Studies•1992

  • The Garden of Priapus

    Amy Richlin, J P Sullivan•The garden of Priapus•1992

  • The Function of Humour in Roman Verse Satire

    Maria Plaza, María Victoria Plaza•The function of humour in Roman…•2006

  • The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire

    Paul Allen Miller•Arethusa•1998

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae