Victims’ experiences and satisfaction with a family justice center
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12936611 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Heather C Melton (0000-0002-8739-5193, University of Utah, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 241-251 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-07-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1759-6599 • E-ISSN: 2042-8715 |
| Editora | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jacpr-03-2019-0405 |
| OpenAlex | W2962075912 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 12 |
Purpose The family justice center (FJC) model centralizes social and legal services available to intimate partner abuse (IPA) victims in order to facilitate their help-seeking and improve their experiences and the response to IPA. Little, yet promising, research has highlighted the effectiveness of this model. The purpose of this paper is to explore experiences of victims of IPA at one FJC. Design/methodology/approach In total, 24 respondents who utilized a FJC in a western county in the USA were interviewed using a survey that included both descriptive quantitative and qualitative questions. Descriptive analysis was performed on the quantitative portion and content analysis on the qualitative portion. Findings Most of the respondents used the FJC multiple times and for multiple services. Most were referred by a shelter or a hotline. The most common services used were housing services, followed by counseling. Overall, these respondents felt supported by FJC staff and were satisfied. However, some of the respondents who did indicate satisfaction in the quantitative portion of the survey expressed concerns in the qualitative portion. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by a small sample size; however, it has implications for recruitment, outreach and training as well as methodological implications for how FJCs should be evaluated. Originality/value This paper adds to the scant literature on FJCs and the FJC model
Descriptive statistics · Economic Justice · Hotline · Originality · Outreach · Political science · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Sociology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Engineering · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
Enhancing the Impact of Family Justice Centers via Motivational Interviewing
A community considers a Family Justice Center
Coordinated Community Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in the 20th and 21st Centuries
Barriers to Domestic Violence Help Seeking
From the Voices of Women
On the Lived Experience of Battered Women Residing in Shelters
The Association Between Different Types of Intimate Partner Violence Experienced by Women
Family justice centres
Victim voice in reenvisioning responses to sexual and physicalviolence nationally and internationally
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |