An examination of potential biases in research designs used to assess the efficacy of sex offender treatment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12936807 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anthony Beech, Anthony R Beech (0000-0002-6681-802X, University of Birmingham, corresponding author), Nick Freemantle (0000-0001-5807-5740, University College London), Caroline Power, Dawn Fisher (University of Birmingham) |
| Editors | Leam Dr Louise Dixon |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 204-222 |
| Publication date | 2015-09-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1759-6599 • E-ISSN: 2042-8715 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jacpr-01-2015-0154 |
| OpenAlex | W2113864063 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 58 |
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential biases in research designs used to assess the efficacy of sex offender treatment. Design/methodology/approach: In all, 50 treatment studies (n = 13,886) were examined using a random effects meta-analysis model. Findings: Results indicated a positive effect of treatment for both sexual (OR = 0.58, 95%, CI 0.45-0.74, p <0.0001), and general recidivism (OR = 0.54, 95%, CI 0.42-0.69, p <0.0001), indicating that the likelihood of being reconvicted after treatment was around half compared to no treatment. RCTs showed no significant effect for sexual or general, recidivism. Significant effects were found for non-RCT designs (i.e. incidental cohort, completers vs non-completers designs). Assignment based on need (i.e. giving treatment to those who were high-risk) indicated a negative effect of treatment. Practical implications: The results highlight the importance of considering study design when considering treatment efficacy. Originality/value: The current research reports studies identified up until 2009, and examined both published, and unpublished, research originating from a variety of samples employing a random effects model. Consequently, it can be argued that the results are both original and are reflective not only of identified studies, but are also representative of a random set of observations drawn from the common population distribution (Fleiss, 1993). The results of the study suggest that what is required in future research is methodological rigour, and consistency, in the way in which researchers measure the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)
Sex offender · Clinical Psychology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness
A narrative review of research on clinical responses to the problem of sexual offenses in the last decade
Design of the “Up2U” domestic abuse perpetrator programme
The Psychology of Literacy
Predicting relapse
The Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply To Sexual Offenders
Fixed‐ versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis
The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
A meta-analysis of psychotherapy dropout.
Appraisal and management of risk in sexual aggressors
Is the crime drop of the 1990s in Canada and the USA associated with a general decline in risky and health-related behavior
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2020 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |