Corruption, impunity and mistrust
Moving beyond police gatekeepers for researching gangs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12936882 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ellen Van Damme (0000-0002-9603-5229, KU Leuven, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2/3 |
| Pages | 125-135 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1759-6599 • E-ISSN: 2042-8715 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jacpr-01-2021-0572 |
| OpenAlex | W3184227952 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 32 |
Purpose This paper aims to discuss the importance of having several entry points into the field, via gatekeepers who do not belong to law enforcement agencies, in contexts where the police cannot be defined as trustworthy. Design/methodology/approach The argumentation of this paper is based on qualitative research on women and gangs in Honduras. An ethnographical methodology was implemented, which included over a year of observations, 65 interviews and two focus groups in gang-controlled communities and detention centers in Central America (with a focus on Honduras), between 2017 and 2020. The paper implements a feminist reflexive approach, focusing on patriarchy, positionality and silence. Findings Collaborating with the police as gatekeepers in gang research needs to be reevaluated. In countries such as Honduras, the police are riddled with corruption and impunity, which eventually leads to mistrust among gang members and other citizens. Hence, it is recommended to approach other, non-law enforcement, gatekeepers, who often stand much closer to the gangs and have a less conflicted or biased position toward them and toward other people living in gang areas. Research limitations/implications A feminist reflexive approach is recommended for researching women and gangs, and thus also for choosing the right gatekeepers in the field, taking into account researchers’ and gatekeepers’ positionality. Originality/value Police corruption in relation to gangs and gang-related crimes often goes unreported and silences people living in gang-controlled areas. This paper exposes these conflicted roles, not only regarding police abuse vis-à-vis gangs and people living in gang areas but also in relation to gang researchers in the field
Criminology · Human rights · Impunity · Language change · Law enforcement · Organised crime · Originality · Political science · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions
Informed Grounded Theory
Quagol
The Origins of Southern California Latino Gangs
No, Honduras Isn’t Necessarily Getting Safer
Central American maras
Patriarchy, Crime, and Justice
Negotiating gatekeepers and positionality in building trust for accessing the urban poor in the Global South
It’s as if you don’t know, because you don’t do anything about it”
White Ethnography
Understanding, embracing and reflecting upon the messiness of doctoral fieldwork
Researching the Gendered Silences of Violence in El Salvador
The violence work of transnational gangs in Central America
Researching Girls and Violence. Facing the Dilemmas of Fieldwork
When Overt Research Feels Covert
Reassessing the research relationship
Joining the Gang and Becoming aBroder
Rolling the Windows Up
Fieldwork as Social Transformation
Toward a Fugitive Anthropology
Dancing with danger
Sexual(ized) harassment and ethnographic fieldwork
Hegemonic Masculinity
When Crime Is a "Young Man's Game" and the Ethnographer Is a Woman
Sexual violence during research
Differences between Gang Girls and Gang Boys
The Organizational Career of Gang Statistics
Feet of clay
Change among the Gatekeepers
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |