Examining Genealogy as Engaged Critique
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12947740 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sana Haddad (0000-0001-5072-1699, Fordham University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 28 |
| Pages | 4-9 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foucault Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1832-5203 • E-ISSN: 1832-5203 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.22439/fs.v1i28.6069 |
| OpenAlex | W3088805582 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Revolution, State Violence, Empire is a rich text. Its analyses range across two centuries in the histories of terrorism at the same time as it makes an important contribution to methodological debates taking place among those working in Foucault's wake. While I very much appreciated and learned from the careful genealogical work that Erlenbusch-Anderson does in tracing the various meanings and functions that terrorism has had in France, Russia, Algeria, and the United States, I will restrict my remarks in this brief intervention to questions of method that the book raises, specifically regarding genealogy as a method and its use as a tool of critical intervention
Epistemology · Genealogy · Sociology · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · History · Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |