Pillepallescapes – Journeys to the edges of socially shared landscape constructions

Bibliographic Data

ID12948656
AuthorsOlaf Kühne (0000-0003-1815-3745, Institute for Urban and Regional Research, corresponding author), J Fischer (0000-0001-8182-3284, University of Tübingen), M Antrop, K Berr, O Khne, W Schenk, D Bruns, D Mnderlein, N Bttner, A Christensen (0009-0005-2642-4228), S Svenningsen, J Brandt (0009-0002-1698-6612), T Cresswell, F Dickmann, J Keil, P Dickmann, D Edler, A Dix, D Drexler, U Eisel, S Endre, D Fontaine (0000-0002-4348-2623), F Forberg, P Gipe, T Greider, L Garkovich, C Jenal, L Koegst, S Krner, C Kropp, M Khn, F Weber (0009-0001-1807-5938), M-L Zimmer, G Schffauer, K Schuster, D Parush, D Shmueli, H Lehmann, M Leibenath, A Otto, S Liebal, N Weber (0000-0001-6341-2537), N Luhmann (0000-0003-1108-058X), J Makhzoumi, A Nassehi, M Pasqualetti, B Pedroli, L-P Peng, K Popper, J Porteous, J Ritter, R Rorty, R Schreg, R Stotten, M Termeer, U Wardenga, W Wojtkiewicz, S Heiland
Year2022
Volume16
Issue2
Publication date2022-11-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHUMAN GEOGRAPHIES – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1843-6587 • E-ISSN: 2067-2284
PublisherUniversity of Bucharest (Bucharest University Press) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5719/hgeo.2022.162.3
OpenAlexW4311159823
LanguageEN
References cited16

In this paper, the construction of landscape is contoured by its negation of non-landscape, making visible a space of meaning that we call pillepallescapes. Pillepallescapes is understood, among other things, as a secondary meaning that can often lead to disputes about its relevance, thus revealing ambiguous polyvalences in the quest to unify the world. We introduce pillepall to the context of landscape studies for elements which, from certain perspectives, appear to be insignificant to these landscape constructions. However, it is at these borderlines of meaningfulness -the pillepallescapes, the object of what oscillates between landscape and non-landscape -that conflicts over landscape interpretive sovereignty seem to spark. When framed neopragmatically, this contribution self-ironically opens up a relevant extension for landscape research, from which methodologicalanalytical, as well as cartographic innovation potentials, can be derived

Geography · Sociology · Psychology · Urban Planning and Landscape Design

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access