Shifting Ideologics of Research Funding
The CPC's National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12952363 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Heike Holbig (0000-0002-3406-2600, Chinese and East Asian area studies at Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main., autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2014 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 13-32 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Current Chinese Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1868-1026 • E-ISSN: 1868-4874 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/186810261404300203 |
| OpenAlex | W2911695502 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 15 |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
For more than two decades, the National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (NPOPSS) has been managing official funding of social science research in China under the orbit of the Communist Party of China's (CPC) propaganda system. By focusing on “Major Projects”, the most prestigious and well-funded program initiated by the NPOPSS in 2004, this contribution outlines the political and institutional ramifications of this line of official funding and attempts to identify larger shifts during the past decade in the “ideologics” of official social science research funding – the changing ideological circumscriptions of research agendas in the more narrow sense of echoing party theory and rhetoric and – in the broader sense – of adapting to an increasingly dominant official discourse of cultural and national self-assertion. To conclude, this article offers reflections on the potential repercussions of these shifts for international academic collaboration
China · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Public Administration
The Resurgence of Ideology under Xi Jinping and International Relations Scholarship in China
The Humanitarian Aspect of China-Russia Relations as an Important Component of Strategic Partnership
Whither Chinese IR? The Sinocentric subject and the paradox of Tianxia-ism
Social Sciences, Humanities and Liberal Arts
Keeping a low profile and queering Chinese academia
How Does an Authoritarian State Co-opt Its Social Scientists Studying Civil Society
Waiqi white collars als obsolete Avantgarde. Einheimische Angestellte ausländischer Unternehmen im chinesischen Modernisierungsdiskurs
Chinese academia wouldn’t be tolerant of my research’
More Stick than Carrot
Democratization and knowledge in social sciences
Educated acquiescence
Whose New Normal? Framing the Economic Slowdown Under Xi Jinping
Leaders or “Guides” of Public Opinion? The Media Role of Chinese Foreign Policy Experts
Polar Contradictions
Brokered Dependency, Authoritarian Malepistemization, and Spectacularized Postcoloniality
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,88 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 15 |