Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Shifting Ideologics of Research Funding

The CPC's National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12952363
AutoresHeike Holbig (0000-0002-3406-2600, Chinese and East Asian area studies at Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main., autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen43
Número2
Páginas13-32
Fecha de publicación2014-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Current Chinese Affairs (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1868-1026 • E-ISSN: 1868-4874
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/186810261404300203
OpenAlexW2911695502
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas15
Referencias citadas5

For more than two decades, the National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (NPOPSS) has been managing official funding of social science research in China under the orbit of the Communist Party of China's (CPC) propaganda system. By focusing on “Major Projects”, the most prestigious and well-funded program initiated by the NPOPSS in 2004, this contribution outlines the political and institutional ramifications of this line of official funding and attempts to identify larger shifts during the past decade in the “ideologics” of official social science research funding – the changing ideological circumscriptions of research agendas in the more narrow sense of echoing party theory and rhetoric and – in the broader sense – of adapting to an increasingly dominant official discourse of cultural and national self-assertion. To conclude, this article offers reflections on the potential repercussions of these shifts for international academic collaboration

China · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Public Administration

  • The Resurgence of Ideology under Xi Jinping and International Relations Scholarship in China

    Open Access•Sabine Mokry•International Studies Perspectives•2024

  • The Humanitarian Aspect of China-Russia Relations as an Important Component of Strategic Partnership

    Open Access•Yuyao Wu•RUDN Journal of Russian History•2020

  • Whither Chinese IR? The Sinocentric subject and the paradox of Tianxia-ism

    Open Access•Sinan Chu•International Theory•2020

  • Social Sciences, Humanities and Liberal Arts

    Open Access•Kang Liu, Liu Kang•European Review•2018

  • Keeping a low profile and queering Chinese academia

    Le Cui•International Studies in…•2022

  • How Does an Authoritarian State Co-opt Its Social Scientists Studying Civil Society

    Open Access•Ji Ma•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2022

  • Waiqi white collars als obsolete Avantgarde. Einheimische Angestellte ausländischer Unternehmen im chinesischen Modernisierungsdiskurs

    Open Access•Junchen Yan•Berliner Journal für Soziologie•2022

  • Chinese academia wouldn’t be tolerant of my research’

    Le Cui•Culture Health & Sexuality•2023

  • More Stick than Carrot

    Wenting Yang, FLORENCE W YANG•Issues & Studies•2021

  • Democratization and knowledge in social sciences

    Open Access•Amir Tayebi, Sheida Teimouri•Public Choice•2025

  • Educated acquiescence

    Open Access•Elizabeth J Perry•Theory and Society•2020

  • Whose New Normal? Framing the Economic Slowdown Under Xi Jinping

    Open Access•Heike Holbig•Journal of Chinese Political…•2018

  • Leaders or “Guides” of Public Opinion? The Media Role of Chinese Foreign Policy Experts

    Open Access•Pascal Abb•Modern China•2021

  • Polar Contradictions

    Erdem Lamazhapov•Geopolitics•2025

  • Brokered Dependency, Authoritarian Malepistemization, and Spectacularized Postcoloniality

    Open Access•Yao Lin•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • China's Thought Management

    Anne-Marie Brady•China's thought management•2012

  • Ideology and Organization in Communist China

    Franz Schurmann•Ideology and Organization in…•1968

  • Regime legitimacy in contemporary China

    Peter Ferdinand•Democratization•2012

Obras citantes distintas15
Citas por año1,88
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2025 (8)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 15
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae