Technology, R2P, and the UN Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes

Bibliographic Data

ID12960657
AuthorsFederica D’Alessandra (0000-0002-6532-2153, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Ross James Gildea (0000-0002-7688-4549, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities)
Year2024
Volume16
Issue4
Pages363-390
Publication date2024-03-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1875984x-20240002
OpenAlexW4393232524
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

How should rapid developments in digital and cyber technology shape our understanding of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)? And in operationalising the doctrine, how might insights on the impact of technology be integrated within key tools of R2P implementation, such as the United Nations Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes? Although prior literature has produced rich discussion of R2P as a norm, and of the politics surrounding it, analysts have paid ‘far less attention to what R2P looks like in practice’, especially with regard to advances in new technology. In this article we contend that, whether we look at the future of R2P through a normative/legal lens, or from a policy/operational perspective, grappling with the impact of technology on the practical realities of mass atrocity situations is of critical importance. To explore this argument, we empirically engage with one of the primary tools through which the implementation of R2P has benefited, the UN Framework of Analysis on Atrocity Crimes ( unfaac )

Business · Criminology · International law · Law and economics · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access