Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Some Psycho-Social Correlates of US Citizen Support for Torture

Bibliographic Data

ID12965697
AuthorsDavid L Richards (University of Connecticut, corresponding author), Mandy Morrill (0000-0003-1972-5709, Valparaiso University), Mary R Anderson (0000-0002-4140-2626, University of Tampa)
Year2012
Volume30
Issue01
Pages63-95
Publication date2012-06-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNordic Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1891-814X • E-ISSN: 1891-8131
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.18261/issn1891-814x-2012-01-04
OpenAlexW2274761759
LanguageEN
Citations received16

We use an original survey to both ascertain US citizens’ attitudes about the use of torture, and to begin to explore why they have these views. While there exists widely-agreed-upon findings regarding the state-level determinants of government respect for human rights such as torture, much less is understood about either the distribution or formation of individual citizens’ attitudes about human rights. Our investigation of the formation of citizen attitudes about torture goes beyond the overly-simple explanation of respondents’ party identification used in the media by examining how respondents’ exposure to violence, and their levels of empathy, tolerance, as well as general conformity-related attitudes might affect their views about torture. Further, we go beyond asking abstract questions about torture and, instead, ask respondents about their attitudes towards particular torture techniques. We use this information to construct the Torture Acceptability Index (TAI) to measure individuals’ overall level of acceptance of torture.Our findings from empirical analysis confirm our hypotheses that there exists a statistically significant relationship between several psycho-social factors and individual attitudes towards torture, even accounting for one’s party identification

Construct (python library · Criminology · Empathy · Government (linguistics · Human rights · Political science · Torture · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Psychology · Social Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law

  • Outgroups and ingroups

    Open Access•M Haner, M M Sloan et al.•Social Forces•2025

  • How combining framing strategies affects human rights micromobilization

    Open Access•Kyla Mcentire, Michele Leiby et al.•Research & Politics•2017

  • Gendered framing in human rights campaigns

    Michele Leiby, Angela L Bos et al.•Journal of Human Rights•2021

  • The gender gap in support for humanitarian interventions

    Mary-Kate Lizotte•Journal of Human Rights•2020

  • How protest affects opinions of peaceful demonstration and expression rights

    Amanda Murdie, Carolin Purser•Journal of Human Rights•2016

  • Beyond the media's explanation

    Mary R Anderson, David L Richards•Journal of Human Rights•2018

  • Tick, Tick, Boom

    Open Access•K Anne Watson•PS Political Science & Politics•2022

  • Two sides of the same coin

    Alexandra Haines, Michele Leiby et al.•International Interactions•2020

  • Public acceptance of gender-based violence as torture

    David L Richards, Alexandra Kapell•Journal of Human Rights•2025

  • Why voters (sometimes) punish repression

    Open Access•Kelly Morrison•Journal of Peace Research•2025

  • Named and Shamed

    Open Access•Kelly Morrison•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2023

  • Threat Perception and American Support for Torture

    Open Access•Courtenay R Conrad, Sarah E Croco et al.•Political Behavior•2018

  • Violence, Nonviolence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law

    Open Access•Yonatan Lupu, Geoffrey P R Wallace•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Mapping advocacy support

    Open Access•Gino Pauselli•Journal of Peace Research•2025

  • Torture and the limits of democratic institutions

    Open Access•Courtenay R Conrad, Daniel W Hill et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2018

  • Human Rights Organizations as Agents of Change

    Open Access•Kyla Jo Mcentire, Kyla Mcentire et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

Unique citing works16
Citations per year1,45
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae