Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Outline of Mimesis, Honor and Dignity in Modern Sport

A Commentary

Bibliographic Data

ID12966309
AuthorsEjgil Jespersen (0000-0003-4512-4886, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume82
Issue1
Pages59-66
Publication date2019-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhysical Culture and Sport Studies and Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1899-4849 • E-ISSN: 2081-2221
PublisherDe Gruyter Open (PUBLISHER • PL)
DOI10.2478/pcssr-2019-0013
OpenAlexW2951211639
LanguageEN
References cited13

When reading the masterpiece about “The Agon Motif” by John W. Loy and W. Robert Morford (2019), I was struck by their recurrent reference to the pursuit of honor in agonal sport contests, as it has become common sense to replace honor with dignity in modernity. I take the German social-philosopher Axel Honneth (1995) as a prime example of spelling out the replacement of honor with dignity in what he names “the struggle for recognition”. In a historical perspective, however, it looks like, that dignity can be understood as a distribution of honor rather than as an oppositional concept of honor. Recognition should not only be conceptualized at the categorical level, but also understood in terms of ‘comparative recognition’, which sorts members of a group into an intra-group hierarchy based on their relative merits and, thereby, pave the way for self-esteem (Mark, 2014). Furthermore, Honneth (2008) develops his concept of recognition to a two-level one by including a primordial recognition in terms of mimesis based upon his former concept of basic self-confidence. It is a kind of elementary responsiveness, which always and necessarily contains an element of involuntary openness or devotedness in the bodily-affective sphere. Therefore, I suggest taking mimesis as the precondition of honor into account and understanding dignity as a distribution of honor in the institution of modern sport

Dignity · Epistemology · Honor · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Computer Science · Doping in Sports · Law · Philosophy · Physical education and sports games research · Psychology · Sports, Gender, and Society

  • The struggle for recognition

    Axel Honneth•The struggle for recognition•1995

  • Background Practices

    Hubert L Dreyfus, Mark A Wrathall•Background Practices•2017

  • The Playing Fields of Eton

    Mika Lavaque-Manty•The playing fields of Eton•2009

  • Kant's Doctrine of Right

    B Sharon Byrd, Betsy Byrd et al.•Kant's Doctrine of Right•2010

  • Reification

    A Honneth, Martin Jay•Reification•2008

  • The Embodied Nature of Autistic Learning

    Open Access•Ejgil Jespersen, Jing He•Physical Culture and Sport…•2015

  • Critical Theory and the Two-Level Account of Recognition - Towards a New Foundation

    Somogy Vargas•Critical Horizons•2010

  • The Duel in European History

    Raymond Grew, V G Kiernan•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1990

  • Recognition and Honor

    Open Access•David Mark, D Clifton Mark•Constellations•2014

  • The Agon Motif

    Open Access•John W Loy, W R Morford•Physical Culture and Sport…•2019

  • On the obsolecence of the concept of honor

    Open Access•Peter Berger•European Journal of Sociology•1970

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae