Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The impact of anonymity and issue controversiality on the quality of online discussion

Bibliographic Data

ID12972123
AuthorsJanne Berg (0000-0002-9369-1298, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume13
Issue1
Pages37-51
Publication date2016-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19331681.2015.1131654
OpenAlexW2335720291
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited69

The quality of online political discussion is a concern regarding the democratic potential of the Internet. Although there is empirical evidence of the highs and lows in terms of the quality of online discussion, little is known about how different factors affect the discussion quality. Moreover, the effects of anonymity and issue controversiality have not been adequately addressed in previous research. Using an experimental design, the findings indicate that, contrary to expectations, anonymity does not necessarily have a negative effect on the discussion quality. Instead, issue controversiality is found to have a greater impact. Several interaction effects are found

Affect (linguistics · Anonymity · Economics · Epistemology · Internet privacy · Online discussion · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Online Deliberative Matrix

    Open Access•Raphaël Kies•Research Methods in Deliberative…•2022

  • O anonimato online como ponte entre experiências cotidianas e presença digital na performance identitária

    Open Access•Elisa Beatriz Ramírez Hernández, Angela Cristina Salgueiro Marques•Trí ade comunicaç ã o cultura e…•2020

  • (Trans)Locality in Social Media News Engagement

    Open Access•Yufan Guo, Luqing Zhou•Digital Journalism•2025

  • The Effects of Technological Affordances on Political Opinion Expression in Social Media

    Open Access•Luna T Frauhammer, Luna Frauhammer et al.•Media Psychology•2026

  • Examining the role of peer engagement and anonymity in studio-based learning

    Open Access•Benard Chindia, Peter Fadde et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2026

  • Does Fear of Isolation Disappear Online? Attention-Seeking Motivators in Online Political Engagement

    Open Access•Kyujin Shim, Klive Oh•Media and Communication•2019

  • Science, God, and Nature

    Brittany Walker, Jennifer Malson•Environmental Communication•2020

  • Online Political Discussion Under Authoritarianism

    Open Access•D Stockmann, Ting Luo•Regulation & Governance•2025

  • The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation

    Open Access•John Gastil•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2018

  • Lonely together? Identifying the determinants of collective corrective action against uncivil comments

    Open Access•Marc Ziegele, Teresa K Naab et al.•New Media & Society•2019

  • Viral misinformation and echo chambers

    Open Access•Xiaohui Wang, Y Song•Internet Research•2020

  • Designing a personal voting guide

    John Gastil, Andrea Felicetti•The Information Society•2025

  • Linking Theories of Motivation, Game Mechanics, and Public Deliberation to Design an Online System for Participatory Budgeting

    Open Access•John Gastil, Michael Broghammer•Political Studies•2021

  • Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform

    Open Access•Arthur Combs, Aidan Combs et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Deliberative Politics in Action

    Open Access•Jürg Steiner, André Bächtiger et al.•Deliberative Politics in Action•2005

  • The Web Of Politics

    Richard Davis•The web of politics•1999

  • Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•Shirley S Ho, Douglas M Mcleod•Communication Research•2008

  • Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes

    Open Access•Carmen R Wilson Van Voorhis, Betsy L Morgan•Tutorials in Quantitative Methods…•2007

  • The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication

    Open Access•Daantje Derks, Agneta H Fischer et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2008

  • Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality

    Open Access•Rebecca B Morton, Kenneth C Williams•Experimental Political Science…•2010

  • A New American Democracy

    Open Access•Mark Twain IV•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2007

  • Cultivating Deliberation for Democracy

    Open Access•Tim van Gelder•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2012

  • Measuring Deliberation’s Content

    Open Access•Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Jennifer Stromer‐galley•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2007

  • Civility 2.0

    Ian Rowe•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Whose voice is heard in online deliberation

    Steffen Albrecht•Information Communication & Society•2006

  • Perceived Versus Actual Disagreement

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Magdalena E Wojcieszak et al.•Journal of Communication•2012

  • The spiral of silence

    Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann•The spiral of silence•1984

  • Strong Democracy

    Benjamin Barber, Benjamin R Barber•Strong Democracy•2004

  • Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition

    Open Access•Noam Lapidot-Lefler, Azy Barak•Computers in Human Behavior•2011

  • How Many Subjects

    Helena Chmura Kraemer, Christine M Blasey et al.•How Many Subjects?•2016

  • Content Analysis in Mass Communication

    Open Access•Matthew Lombard, Jennifer Snyder-Duch et al.•Human Communication Research•2002

  • Getting political on social network sites

    Open Access•Matthew J Kushin, Kelin Kitchener•First Monday•2009

  • Twenty-Five Years of the Spiral of Silence

    Dietram A Scheufle, Patricia Moy•International Journal of Public…•2000

  • Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers

    Open Access•C P Ruiz, David Domingo et al.•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Understanding Divergent Patterns of Political Discussion in Online Forums—Evidence from the European Citizens' Consultations

    Martin Karlsson•Journal of Information Technology…•2012

  • Beyond “Political” Communicative Spaces

    Todd Graham•Journal of Information Technology…•2012

  • Under Construction

    Stephen Coleman, Giles Mo et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2012

  • Virtuous or Vitriolic

    Arthur D Santana•Journalism Practice•2013

  • Measuring Political Deliberation

    Open Access•Marco R Steenbergen, André Bächtiger et al.•Comparative European Politics•2003

  • Democracy, deliberation and design

    Open Access•Scott Wright, J Street•New Media & Society•2007

  • Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet

    Open Access•Jennifer Stromer‐galley•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere

    Open Access•Lincoln Dahlberg•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation

    Open Access•Seong-Jae Min•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2007

  • Behind Closed Doors

    Open Access•Sherrie Chamber•Journal of Political Philosophy•2004

  • Characteristics of the Discussion in Online and Face-to-Face Focus Groups

    Open Access•Sid J Schneider, Jeffrey Kerwin et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2002

  • Democracy in the Digital Age

    Reviewed By William Wresch•The Information Society•2001

  • Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Davy Janssen, Raphaël Kies•Acta Politica•2005

  • The Online Disinhibition Effect

    Open Access•John R Suler, John Suler•CyberPsychology & Behavior•2004

  • Reader opinion in the digital age

    Open Access•Jill Eileen Richardson, James Stanyer•Journalism•2011

  • Democracy online

    Open Access•Zizi Papacharissi•New Media & Society•2004

  • Polarization and Publicity

    David Stasavage•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Public Spheres on the Internet

    Open Access•Jakob Linaa Jensen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2003

  • When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science

    Open Access•Andréa Bäuchtiger, Dominik Hangartner•Political Studies•2010

  • Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality

    Joseph N Cappella, Joseph Cappella et al.•Political Communication•2002

  • The impact of Internet use patterns on political engagement

    Jiyoung Kim, Ji-Young Kim•Information Polity•2006

  • What's in a Name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity

    Gary T Marx•The Information Society•1999

  • Behavioral Strategies for Dealing with Flaming in An Online Forum

    Open Access•Hangwoo Lee•Sociological Quarterly•2005

  • Reliability in Content Analysis

    Open Access•Klaus Krippendorff•Human Communication Research•2004

  • When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation

    Zoey Chen, Jonah Berger•Journal of Consumer Research•2013

Unique citing works14
Citations per year1,75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae