Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers

Bibliographic Data

ID12977355
AuthorsC P Ruiz (0000-0002-8931-7455, Universitat Ramon Llull, corresponding author), David Domingo (0000-0002-0439-6829, Universitat Rovira i Virgili), Josep-Lluís Micó (0000-0003-1191-226X, Universitat Ramon Llull), Javier Díaz-Noci (0000-0001-9559-4283, Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Koldobika Meso Ayerdi (0000-0002-0400-133X, University of the Basque Country), Pere Masip (0000-0002-8231-0824)
Year2011
Volume16
Issue4
Pages463-487
Publication date2011-09-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Press/Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1940-1612 • E-ISSN: 1040-1620
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1940161211415849
OpenAlexW2160088732
LanguageEN
Citations received168
References cited26

Comments in online news could be the contemporary enactment of the eighteenth-century cafés that founded public sphere. This article assesses to what extent do these forms of digital discussion fit in Habermas’ principles for democratic debate, using his discursive ethics as a demanding normative benchmark. The sample of more than 15,000 comments was selected from the online versions of five national newspapers of record from different political and journalistic contexts: The Guardian (United Kingdom), Le Monde (France), The New York Times (United States), El País (Spain), and La Repubblica (Italy). The ethical guidelines and legal frameworks set up by the newspapers as well as their moderation strategies were considered to understand the different settings of the conversations. Two models of audience participation emerge from the analysis, one where communities of debate are formed based on mostly respectful discussions between diverse points of view and another of homogenous communities , in which expressing feelings about current events dominates the contributions and there is less of an argumentative debate

Democracy · Guardian · Media studies · Moderation · Newspaper · Normative · Political science · Politics · Public sphere · Sociology · Law · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • AI for democratic participation? Citizens’ perceptions of problems in online participation processes and AI-based solutions

    Open Access•Carina Weinmann, Mira Warné et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2026

  • European E-Democracy in Practice

    Leonhard Hennen, Ira Van Keulen et al.•European E-Democracy in Practice•2019

  • The coup that flopped

    Open Access•Jaroslav Švelch, Václav Štětka•First Monday•2016

  • The deliberative influence of comment section structure

    Open Access•C Peacock, Joshua M Scacco et al.•Journalism•2017

  • Emerging Trends in Small Acts of Audience Engagement and Interruptions of Content Flows

    Open Access•Jelena Kleut, Tereza Pavlíčková et al.•The Future of Audiences•2018

  • New Media, News Production and Consumption

    Open Access•Eugenia Mitchelstein, Pablo J Boczkowski•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten

    Open Access•Uwe Jensen, Sebastian Netscher et al.•Forschungsdatenmanagement…•2019

  • Retooling Politics

    Open Access•Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero et al.•Retooling Politics•2020

  • Trolling the trolls

    Open Access•Bryn Alexander Coles, Melanie West•Computers in Human Behavior•2016

  • Deliberation 2.0

    Ian Rowe•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2015

  • Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online

    Open Access•Kate Kenski, Kevin Coe et al.•Communication Research•2020

  • A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research

    Open Access•Dennis Frieß, Christiane Eilders•Policy & Internet•2015

  • Exploring Participatory Journalism in Mediterranean Countries

    Jaume Suau, Pere Masip•Journalism Practice•2013

  • Australian journalist-blogs

    Open Access•Mary Garden•Journalism•2014

  • Analyzing the active audience

    Open Access•Lia‐paschalia Spyridou, Lia-Paschalia Spyridou•Journalism•2018

  • News comment sections and online echo chambers

    Open Access•Jiyoung Han, Young In Lee et al.•Journalism•2022

  • The comment gap

    Open Access•Clara Juarez Miro•Journalism•2020

  • Predicting perceptions of incivility across 20 news comment sections

    Open Access•Emily Van Duyn, Ashley Muddiman•Journalism•2020

  • Contest Over Content

    Lea Hellmueller, You Li•Journalism Practice•2014

  • Fewer but More Elaborate

    Open Access•Avner Kantor, Sheizaf Rafaeli•Journalism Studies•2026

  • Kommentoijat julkisina osallistujina

    Open Access•Veera Kangaspunta•Media & viestintä•2022

  • Content Analyses of User Comments in Journalism

    Open Access•Julius Reimer, Marlo Häring et al.•Digital Journalism•2023

  • La “reacción” como aproximación a los antagonismos sociales en la esfera pública digital

    Open Access•Carlos Alberto Carrizales González•Avatares de la comunicación y la…•2024

  • Sinergias de sororidad en las comunidades virtuales de las revistas femeninas. El caso del cierre del foro de Vogue

    Open Access•María Ganzabal Learreta, Koldobika Meso Ayerdi et al.•Revista Latina de Comunicación…•2020

  • Comparing the Empowerment Dynamics of Traditional Media and Social News Sites

    Open Access•Maria Laura Ruiu, Massimo Ragnedda•Digital Journalism•2024

  • Using Facebook Messenger versus Groups for News Engagement

    Caroline Murray, Martin J Riedl et al.•Digital Journalism•2024

  • News Engagement on Closed Platforms. Human Factors and Technological Affordances Influencing Exposure to News on WhatsApp

    Pere Masip, Jaume Suau et al.•Digital Journalism•2021

  • Rational-Critical User Discussions

    Open Access•Hanna Marzinkowski, Ines Engelmann•Digital Journalism•2022

  • Wolność wypowiedzi a odpowiedzialność za słowo. Systemy moderacji komentarzy użytkowników w polskich informacyjnych serwisach internetowych

    Open Access•Marta Więckiewicz-Archacka•Kultura - Media - Teologia•2025

  • How user comments affect news readers’ outgroup prejudice

    Open Access•Wufan Jia, Lunrui Fu et al.•Journalism•2026

  • How to report on elections? The effects of game, issue and negative coverage on reader engagement and incivility

    Open Access•Joao Fernando Ferreira Goncalves, Sara Pereira et al.•Journalism•2022

  • The access control double bind

    Open Access•Daniel L Gardner, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum•Convergence The International…•2024

  • The interplay of personal storytelling with rational justifications in online discussions

    Julia Jakob•Javnost - The Public•2022

  • Locally, Regionally and Nationally Online

    Open Access•Veera Kangaspunta•Javnost - The Public•2020

  • Which Perceived Opinion Climates Influence the Participation in Online Political Discussions

    Ole Kelm, Marco Dohle et al.•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2024

  • How to get on top – the effect of rationality and incivility of user comments on their visibility in political online discussions on Facebook

    Pablo Jost, Marc Ziegele•Communication Research Reports•2022

  • Do trolls just want to have fun? Assessing the role of humor-related traits in online trolling behavior

    Open Access•Ginés Navarro‐carrillo, Jorge Torres‐Marín et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • The role of online news and social media in preventive action in times of infodemic from a social capital perspective

    Open Access•Junmin Lee, Keungoui Kim et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2021

  • Moderating professional learning on social media - A balance between monitoring, facilitation and expert membership

    Open Access•Thomas Hillman, Mona Lundin et al.•Computers & Education•2021

  • El impacto de los servicios móviles de mensajería instantánea en las percepciones ciudadanas sobre la democracia en España

    Open Access•Alejandra Tirado García, Andreu Casero-Ripollés•Palabra Clave•2025

  • Is Constructive Engagement Online a Lost Cause? Toxic Outrage in Online User Comments Across Democratic Political Systems and Discussion Arenas

    Open Access•Julia Jakob, Timo Dobbrick et al.•Communication Research•2023

  • Digital Public Sphere and Geography

    Open Access•Andreu Casero-Ripollés, Josep-Lluís Micó et al.•Media and Communication•2020

  • Behind the Comments Section

    Open Access•Orge Castellano Parra, Koldobika Meso Ayerdi et al.•Media and Communication•2020

  • Hacia la democratización del periodismo participante

    Open Access•Daniel Barredo Ibáñez, Martín Oller Alonso•Revista Mediterranea de…•2013

  • Incidental Exposure to Non-Like-Minded News through Social Media

    Open Access•Pere Masip, Jaume Suau et al.•Media and Communication•2020

  • How Right-Wing Populist Comments Affect Online Deliberation on News Media Facebook Pages

    Open Access•Daniel Thiele, Tjaša Turnšek•Media and Communication•2022

  • ‘Let’s Get Them Involved’ . . . to Some Extent

    Open Access•Susanne M Almgren, Susanne Almgren et al.•Social Media + Society•2015

  • Echo Chambers of Denial

    Stefanie Walter, Michael Brüggemann et al.•Environmental Communication•2018

  • Making Sense of the Online Forum Posts of Two Books on Zheng He’s Voyages

    Dexin Tian, Chin‐Chung Chao et al.•Journal of Intercultural…•2017

  • La campaña contra el ‘manspreading’ entre paisaje semiótico y eco mediático

    Gianluca Pontrandolfo•Spanish in Context•2019

  • Civility 2.0

    Ian Rowe•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • User comments

    Nina Springer, Ines Engelmann et al.•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • The dynamics of online news discussions

    Marc Ziegele, Mathias Weber et al.•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Real time political deliberation on social media

    Lindita Camaj•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • Agenda setting and active audiences in online coverage of human trafficking

    Maria Eirini Papadouka, Nicholas Evangelopoulos et al.•Information Communication & Society•2016

  • The effect of comment moderation on perceived bias in science news

    Sara K Yeo, Leona Yi-Fan Su et al.•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Citizen engagement and the illusion of secrecy

    Inbal Yahav, David G Schwartz•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Revisiting the concept of ‘sharing’ for digital spaces

    Kelly Quinn, Renee M Powers•Information Communication & Society•2016

  • Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments

    Open Access•Kevin Coe, Kate Kenski et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • News Values, Cognitive Biases, and Partisan Incivility in Comment Sections

    Open Access•Ashley Muddiman, Natalie Jomini Stroud•Journal of Communication•2017

  • Public Spheres in Interaction

    Open Access•Florian Toepfl, E Piwoni•Journal of Communication•2015

  • What Creates Interactivity in Online News Discussions? An Exploratory Analysis of Discussion Factors in User Comments on News Items

    Open Access•Marc Ziegele, Timo Breiner et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Public Spheres, Counterpublics’ Fears and Syncopolitics

    Open Access•Fred Dalmasso•Humanities•2020

  • User-Generated (Dis)Content

    Open Access•Nina Springer, Anna Sophie Kümpel•Journalismus im Internet•2018

  • Tweeting the July 2018 Elections in Zimbabwe

    Open Access•Allen Munoriyarwa, Collen Chambwera•Social Media and Elections in…•2020

  • Incivility and disrespectfulness in online political discussion

    Open Access•Angga Prawadika Aji, Ari Sapto•Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik•2020

  • Never Read the Comments

    W Williamson•Planning Practice and Research•2022

  • What’s the meaning of Stonehenge? An exploration of responses to the archaeological site through ‘below the line’ comments in British newspapers

    Open Access•Lorna Jane Richardson•Time and Mind•2026

  • The Power of the “Audience-Public”

    Open Access•Sharath Srinivasan, Stephanie Diepeveen•The International Journal of…•2018

  • The Integrative Complexity of Online User Comments Across Different Types of Democracy and Discussion Arenas

    Open Access•Julia Jakob, Timo Dobbrick et al.•The International Journal of…•2021

  • Crossing Lines in the Twitter Debate on Catalonia’s Independence

    Open Access•Joan Balcells, Albert Padró-Solanet•The International Journal of…•2019

  • The impact of anonymity and issue controversiality on the quality of online discussion

    Janne Berg•Journal of Information Technology…•2016

  • Letting the faculty deliberate

    Dennis Frie, Dennis M Friess•Journal of Information Technology…•2018

  • Extending the Spiral of Silence

    Meredith Y Wang, Jay D Hmielowski et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2017

  • Disruptive Media Events

    Tine Ustad Figenschou, Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud•Journalism Practice•2016

  • Assessing the Prevalence and Predictors of Incivility in Online News Comments Across Six Countries

    Sherri Salgado, Homero Gil De Zúñiga et al.•Journalism Practice•2023

  • Participatory Populism

    Charlotte Galpin, Hans‐jörg Trenz•Journalism Practice•2019

  • The Management of Uncivil and Hateful User Comments in Austrian News Media

    Open Access•Uta Rußmann, Andreas He•Journalism Practice•2023

  • Quality User-Generated Content? A Case Study of the Quality of Online News Comments on the Site of Finnish Public Service Broadcaster Yle

    Open Access•Janne Berg, Andreas Fagerholm et al.•Journalism Practice•2024

  • Negotiating the Conversation

    François-René Martins, Colleen Murrell•Journalism Practice•2021

  • Engagement Moderation

    Gina M Masullo, Martin J Riedl et al.•Journalism Practice•2020

  • Normalizing Online Comments

    Gina M Masullo, Paromita Pain•Journalism Practice•2016

  • Constructive Comments

    Anders Sundnes Løvlie•Journalism Practice•2018

  • Collective memory and social media

    Open Access•Thomas Birkner, André Donk•Memory Studies•2018

  • Grandstanding Instead of Deliberative Policy-Making

    Open Access•D Kostovicova, Lanabi La Lova•Journal of Intervention and…•2024

  • Comentários dos Leitores dos Jornais Online

    Open Access•Kim Strandberg, Janne Berg•Comunicação e Sociedade•2013

  • Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes

    Open Access•Kim Strandberg, Janne Berg•Comunicação e Sociedade•2013

  • The Influence of Anonymity and Incivility on Perceptions of User Comments on News Websites

    Sai Wang•Mass Communication & Society•2020

  • What a nasty girl!” incivility and gendered symbolic violence in news discussions

    Valentina Proust, Magdalena Saldaña•Feminist Media Studies•2022

  • It’s a terrible way to go to work

    Becky Gardiner•Feminist Media Studies•2018

  • Critically Commenting Publics as Authoritarian Input Institutions

    Florian Toepfl, Anna Litvinenko•Journalism Studies•2021

  • Someone Should Do Something”

    Jerome Turner•Journalism Studies•2021

  • To Post or not to Post

    Olga Soffer, Galit Gordoni•Journalism Studies•2017

  • When Journalists Go “Below the Line”

    Open Access•Scott Wright, Daniel Jackson et al.•Journalism Studies•2019

  • Commenting on the News

    Thomas B Ksiazek•Journalism Studies•2016

  • Quality Journalism in Social Media – What We Know and Where We Need to Dig Deeper

    Open Access•Matthias Degen, Max Olgemöller et al.•Journalism Studies•2024

  • Effects of Civility and Reasoning in User Comments on Perceived Journalistic Quality

    Fabian Prochazka, Patrick Weber et al.•Journalism Studies•2016

  • The Good, the Bad, and the Evil Media

    Myiah J Hutchens, Ekaterina Romanova et al.•Journalism Studies•2023

  • Like, recommend, or respect? Altering political behavior in news comment sections

    Open Access•Natalie Jomini Stroud, Ashley Muddiman et al.•New Media & Society•2016

  • Agenda-setting in social TV

    Open Access•M Chung, Young Nam Seo et al.•New Media & Society•2021

  • Comparing Media Systems

    Open Access•Daniel C Hallin, P Mancini•Comparing Media Systems•2004

  • Participatory Journalism

    Open Access•Jane B Singer, Alfred Hermida et al.•Participatory Journalism•2011

  • Computer-Mediated Communication

    Susan C Herring•Computer-mediated communication•1996

  • Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register

    Open Access•Kathleen Ferrara, Kathleen Warden Ferrara et al.•Written Communication•1991

  • Profits and Perils

    Open Access•Deborah S Chung•Convergence The International…•2007

  • User Comments

    Open Access•Zvi Reich•Participatory Journalism•2011

  • Moral consciousness and communicative action

    Jürgen Habermas•Moral consciousness and…•1990

  • Conversación 2.0. y democracia. Análisis de los comentarios de los lectores en la prensa digital catalana

    Open Access•Carlos Ruiz, C P Ruiz et al.•Communication & Society•1970

  • A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  • Habermas and Modernity

    Richard J Bernstein•Habermas and modernity•1985

  • Gatewatching

    Kate Milberry•Canadian Journal of Communication•2006

  • Para estudiar la comunicación de los gobiernos. Un análisis del estado de la cuestión

    Open Access•Maria Jose Canel, Karen Sanders•Communication & Society•1970

  • A Clash of Cultures

    Alfred Hermida, Neil Thurman•Journalism Practice•2008

  • Media(ted) Discourse and Society

    Anabela Carvalho•Journalism Studies•2008

  • Deliberativeness of Online Political Discussion

    Xiang Zhou, Yuen-Ying Chan et al.•Journalism Studies•2008

  • Online “Looney Tunes”

    Brian Michael Goss•Journalism Studies•2007

  • Democracy via Cyberspace

    Open Access•Lincoln Dahlberg•New Media & Society•2001

  • Have They Got News for Us

    Andy Williams, Claire Wardle et al.•Journalism Practice•2010

  • Competition, Complementarity or Integration

    Christoph Neuberger, Christian Nuernbergk•Journalism Practice•2010

  • Objectivity” and “Hard News” Reporting Across Cultures

    Elizabeth Thomson, Elizabeth A Thomson et al.•Journalism Studies•2008

Unique citing works168
Citations per year3
Citation span1970 - 2026 (57)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 165

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae