The political contention of LGBTQ+ communities in the digital age - state of the art, limitations, and opportunities for comparative research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12972128
AutoresVerena K Brändle (0000-0002-4084-8538, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, autor de correspondencia), Olga Eisele (0000-0002-6604-3498, Twitter (United States)), Aytalina Kulichkina (0000-0001-5948-9881, Twitter (United States))
Año2023
Volumen21
Número3
Páginas218-233
Fecha de publicación2023-10-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681
EditorialRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19331681.2023.2263758
OpenAlexW4387299520
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas49

This paper develops an analytical framework for comparative research on political contention in the digital age and, building upon it, provides a literature review of social media research related to LGBTQ+ political contention.So far, we lack systematic insights into the literature on digitallymediated LGBTQ+ political contention and its potential for comparative research.Applying scoping literature review, we focus on the key comparative dimensions such as political context, social media, and knowledge production.The results provide an overview of the state of the art, limitations, and opportunities while also developing an agenda for future comparative research.This paper supports the visibility of LGBTQ+ issues in a still hostile public debate for both LGBTQ+ activists and researchers

Comparative politics · Comparative research · Context (archaeology · Digital media · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Visibility · Computer Science · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Social Media and Politics