Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Explaining digital campaign expenses

The case of the 2018 legislative elections in Colombia

Bibliographic Data

ID12972181
AuthorsGunther Vanden Eynde (0000-0002-6364-8598, Schlumberger (Ireland), corresponding author), Bart Maddens (0000-0001-6935-2571, Twitter (United States))
Year2021
Volume19
Issue3
Pages302-315
Publication date2021-09-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19331681.2021.1973643
OpenAlexW3198115417
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited33

This paper analyses the investment in digital tools and the allocation of communication expenses in a Global South country with an uneven digital penetration rate. Data were collected for 2,563 candidates in the 2018 legislative election in Colombia, based on the official campaign finance disclosure documents. A multivariate analysis shows that particularly challengers invest in social media tools, which is a strong indication in favor of the equalization model. That such an effect is not found for radio and television expenses confirms this interpretation. Candidates on open lists are more inclined to spend on both digital and radio and television tools than candidates on closed lists. At the district level, the odds of spending on digital media increase with the digital media use, but so does the odds of spending on radio and television ads

Advertising · Business · Digital advertising · Digital marketing · Digital media · Digital television · Economics · Investment (military · Legislature · Odds · Political science · Politics · Social media · Social media marketing · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Social Media and Politics

  • Artists' roles and digital strategies in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election

    Open Access•Dimas Subekti, Hapsa Hapsa et al.•Jurnal Studi Komunikasi…•2025

  • Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns

    Open Access•Michaela Fischer, Fabrizio Gilardi•Media and Communication•2023

  • Reckoning with the digital turn in electoral geography

    Open Access•Luke Temple•Progress in Human Geography•2023

  • Digital political campaigning

    Gabriela Borz, Fabrizio De Francesco•Policy Studies•2024

  • Does Digital Campaigning Make a Difference for Individual Candidates in an Open List Proportional Representation System? The Case of the 2019 Election in Belgium

    Open Access•Gunther Vanden Eynde, Bart Maddens•Political Studies•2024

  • Politics as Usual

    Michael Margolis, David Resnick•Politics as Usual•2000

  • Social Media, Parties, and Political Inequalities

    Open Access•Kristof Jacobs, N Spierings•Social Media, Parties, and…•2016

  • The Web Of Politics

    Richard Davis•The web of politics•1999

  • A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization

    Open Access•Robert M Bond, Christopher J Fari et al.•Nature•2012

  • Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media

    Peter Van Aelst, Patrick Van Erkel et al.•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • Politics As Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. Elections

    Open Access•Michael A Xenos, K Foot et al.•Journal of Communication•2005

  • Polarización y demonización en la campaña presidencial de Colombia de 2018

    Open Access•Oscar Andrés Prada Espinel, Luis Miguel Romero-Rodríguez et al.•Girasol/Revista humanidades•2018

  • The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems

    Robert Pekkanen, Erik S Herron et al.•Oxford Handbook of Electoral…•2017

  • Is Web 2.0 Providing a Voice for Outsiders? A Comparison of Personal Web Site and Social Media Use by Candidates at the 2010 UK General Election

    Rosalynd Southern•Journal of Information Technology…•2014

  • Candidates' Web Practices in the 2002 U.S. House, Senate, and Gubernatorial Elections

    K Foot, Steven M Schneider et al.•Journal of Political Marketing•2009

  • Online campaigning

    Open Access•Kim Strandberg•New Media & Society•2009

  • Social networks in political campaigns

    Open Access•Christine B Williams, Girish J Gulati et al.•New Media & Society•2012

  • Party Competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain

    Open Access•Michael Margolis, David Resnick et al.•Harvard International Journal of…•1999

  • Social Media and Campaign 2012

    Open Access•Girish J Gulati, Christine B Williams•Social Science Computer Review•2013

  • Closing the Gap, Raising the Bar

    Open Access•Girish J Gulati, Girish J "Jeff" Gulati et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2007

  • Normalization 2.0

    Open Access•Eva Johanna Schweitzer•European Journal of Communication•2011

  • The Internet and the European Parliament elections

    Open Access•Wainer Lusoli•Information Polity•2005

  • Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning

    Open Access•R Gibson, Rachel K Gibson et al.•Political Studies•2015

  • The Myths of Data-Driven Campaigning

    Jessica Baldwin-Philippi•Political Communication•2017

  • Equal Access, Unequal Success — Major and Minor Canadian Parties On the Net

    Open Access•Tamara A Small•Party Politics•2008

  • Preaching to the Converted

    Open Access•P Norris•Party Politics•2003

  • Incentives to cultivate a personal vote

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Matthew Soberg Shugart•Electoral Studies•1995

  • Electoral reform and the mirror image of inter-party and intra-party competition

    Open Access•Mónica Pachón, Matthew Soberg Shugart•Electoral Studies•2010

  • Endogenous ballot structures

    Open Access•Susan Achury, Margarita Ramírez et al.•Electoral Studies•2017

  • Political Advertising Online and Offline

    Open Access•Erika Franklin Fowler, Michael M Franz et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae