Equal Access, Unequal Success — Major and Minor Canadian Parties On the Net

Bibliographic Data

ID6314744
AuthorsTamara A Small (0000-0001-6554-0962, Mount Allison University, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume14
Issue1
Pages51-70
Publication date2008-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1354068807083823
OpenAlexW2026529813
LanguageEN
Citations received32
References cited14

The Internet has been heralded as the most revolutionary technology since the printing press. Within political science, much work centres around the democratizing potential of the Internet. Cyber-optimists argue that the Internet has the capacity to equalize political competition for parties. Other scholars argue that the Internet will not dramatically change the status of minor parties. Politics on the Internet will be `politics as usual'. Empirical support for both theories is mixed. Research has shown that party-centred countries are more likely to become equalized as a result of the Internet than candidate-centred countries. Using data from the 2004 federal election, this article argues that the Internet has not led to an equalization of party competition in Canada. The websites of nine political parties show that despite equal access to the Internet, there is unequal success in cyberspace for Canadian parties

Competition (biology · Cyberspace · Minor (academic · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · The Internet · Work (physics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub