Protest and repression in China’s digital surveillance state

Bibliographic Data

ID12972247
AuthorsViola Rothschild (0000-0002-7478-4958, Hôpital Rothschild, corresponding author)
Year2024
Pages1-16
Publication date2024-03-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19331681.2024.2326464
OpenAlexW4393355394
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited58

Autocrats around the world are making unprecedented investments in new, digital surveillance technologies to monitor their societies as well as to identify and repress pockets of dissent. Using an original dataset of local procurement of digital surveillance technologies, merged with micro-data on collective action events, I examine the logic and motivation for the digital surveillance buildup in China, the bellwether of digital dictatorships. I find that localities do indeed tend to allocate increased spending for digital surveillance in response to high volumes of collective action. Why citizens protest appears to be of less concern: protest claims do not have a significant impact on digital surveillance spending. However, how citizens protest makes a great deal of difference: more violent protests prompt significantly higher levels of investment in digital surveillance. This study's findings have important implications for understanding autocrats' evolving strategies of control in the digital age

Biology · China · Computer security · Political science · Psychological repression · State (computer science · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Computer Science · Law · Genetics

Tools

Open DOI