Disputes in the South China Sea
Does the Arctic Council offer a viable regional governance model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12979700 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Serafettin Yilmaz (0000-0001-8159-651X, Shandong University, corresponding author), Fu-Kuo Liu (0000-0002-2090-4387, National Chengchi University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-24 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Politics & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1943-0787 • E-ISSN: 1943-0779 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/aspp.12620 |
| OpenAlex | W4205407100 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
Territorial disputes in the South China Sea (SCS) over sovereignty, jurisdictional boundaries, and entitlements continue to demand attention from policymakers and analysts. Under the pressure of the intensifying China‐US strategic rivalry, the region has also become a primary theater for military and political muscle‐flexing. Maintaining regional peace and development has therefore become a greater urgency. In this article, we argue that a regional actors‐led institutional mechanism consisting of a core and integrated periphery may provide the required formalized space to govern the SCS through clearly defined rules and legally binding regulations drawn both from the regimes that exist in the region and from the international conventions. We analyze the conditions behind and implications for the formal institutionalization in the SCS modeled after the Arctic Council. This article claims that a new thinking on regional maritime governance in the SCS is now a strategic imperative
Business · China · Corporate governance · Economics · Institutionalisation · International trade · International waters · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rivalry · Sovereignty · The arctic · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · International Maritime Law Issues · Island Studies and Pacific Affairs · Law · Public Administration · Finance
Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Arctic
The Shared Challenges of Institutional Theories
Polar Law and Resources
Comparing Institution-Building in East Asia
Maritime Boundary Delimitation and Sino-Vietnamese Cooperation in the Gulf of Tonkin (1994-2016)
The impact of Covid-19 on Asean
The IMF, Neoliberalism and Hegemony
The Evolving Geopolitical Landscape in the Post‐Arbitration South China Sea
Rethinking the South China Sea Issue
Regionalism's multiple negotiations
Southeast Asia in the study of international relations
Establishment of the Asean Regional Forum
The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory
Solving the “Wicked Problems” of Maritime Security
Deciphering the Shift in America's South China Sea Policy
Maritime Territorialization, UNCLOS and the Timor Sea Dispute
Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance
Conflict and Diplomacy in the South China Sea
Japan’s Approach to Maritime Security in the South China Sea
The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline
Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions
The South China Sea Arbitration
Mare Liberum
China's ambition in the South China Sea
Asean and China in the South China Sea Disputes
Between assertiveness and self-restraint
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |