Smoke on the beach”
On the use of economic vs behavioral policies to reduce environmental pollution by cigarette littering
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12989372 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gionata Castaldi (University of Rome Tor Vergata, corresponding author), Grazia Cecere (0000-0001-6349-9222, Institut Mines-Télécom), Mariangela Zoli (0000-0002-4362-1419, University of Rome Tor Vergata) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1025-1048 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economia Politica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1973-820X • E-ISSN: 1120-2890 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s40888-020-00205-5 |
| OpenAlex | W3104487693 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 57 |
Cigarette filters, the most commonly littered item worldwide, are one of the main sources of marine pollution. However, reducing cigarette littering is a serious challenge for policy makers and environmental authorities: traditional instruments like bans and fines are generally ineffective. In this article, we evaluate the impact of two interventions aimed at reducing smokers’ littering in public areas, like beaches. We run a field experiment at eight beach resorts in the north east coast of Italy. Resorts were randomly assigned to three groups: in the first, we introduced portable ashtrays to test whether smokers respond to the lower effort costs (time plus inconvenience) by disposing of litter properly. In the second set, we added a social cue. The third group of resorts was used as a control with no intervention. Results suggest that reducing the private costs of a proper disposal through mobile ashtrays significantly affects littering, leading to a reduction of 10–12% in the number of cigarette filters dropped in the sand compared to beaches with no ashtrays. Reinforcing this measure with social prompts does not significantly increase the impact driven by the introduction of mobile ashtrays
Business · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Intervention (counseling · Litter · Psychological intervention · Smoke · Waste management · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Environmental Science · Medicine · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Psychology · Ecology · Pollution
Nudging to reduce meat consumption
A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct
The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris
Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment
Experimental methods
Behavioral Economics and Public Policy
Field experiments in economics
Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions
Cigarette Litter
Cigarettes Butts and the Case for an Environmental Policy on Hazardous Cigarette Waste
Tobacco litter costs and public policy
Regulating the disposal of cigarette butts as toxic hazardous waste
Analysis of metals leached from smoked cigarette litter
Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish
Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste
A behavioral community program for litter control
Why a nudge is not enough
A focus theory of normative conduct
Why Economists Should Conduct Field Experiments and 14 Tips for Pulling One Off
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |