Surviving spouses in legal limbo
The waiting period for presumption of death under Malaysian law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12995122 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vennila Muniandy (0009-0000-1117-4127, Associates Research), Nadhilah A Kadir (0000-0003-1869-2124, National University of Malaysia), Ramalinggam Rajamanickam (0000-0003-4017-8826, Multimedia University), R G Sugithkumar (Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University), B Viswanathan (Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | e819-e819 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-28 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interpersona An International Journal on Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1981-6472 • E-ISSN: 1981-6472 |
| Publisher | PsychOpen (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.54899/ijpr.v20i1.819 |
| OpenAlex | W7150974438 |
| Language | EN |
The disappearance of a spouse places the surviving partner in a prolonged state of legal uncertainty under Malaysian law. This uncertainty is principally governed by section 108 of the Evidence Act 1950, which establishes a rebuttable presumption of death after seven years of unexplained absence, and section 63 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, which provides a matrimonial remedy through a decree of presumption of death and divorce. Although both provisions are triggered by the same factual condition, their legal functions and consequences remain uncoordinated. Section 108 operates as a general evidential rule applicable across legal contexts, while section 63 is confined to the dissolution of marriage and does not determine death for proprietary or administrative purposes. This article argues that the lack of coordination between these provisions places surviving spouses in a prolonged state of legal limbo. Even where marital status is resolved under section 63, access to property, estate administration, financial entitlements, and parental authority remains constrained until death is separately established through evidential and probate processes. This fragmented structure generates procedural duplication, financial hardship, and sustained personal and economic burdens during the statutory waiting period. Drawing on legal analysis, judicial interpretation, and comparative perspectives from jurisdictions that adopt integrated presumption of death frameworks, the article demonstrates that section 63, in its present form, offers limited protective value. It concludes that targeted reform is necessary to harmonise evidential and matrimonial consequences, reduce procedural fragmentation, and restore legal certainty for surviving spouses affected by disappearance
Certainty · Decree · Estate · Legal certainty · Presumption · Probate · Spouse · Statutory law · Trust law · Wrongful death · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Legal and cultural studies analysis · Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|