Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cross-Border Carbon Regulation and Forests in Russia

From Expectations and Myth to Realization of Interests

Bibliographic Data

ID12997448
AuthorsЕ А Шварц (0000-0002-6828-4367), Andrey V Ptichnikov, Alexey Kokorin, A N Krenke (0000-0001-9830-9660)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue5
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomic Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1994-5124 • E-ISSN: 2411-2658
PublisherEconomic Policy (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.18288/1994-5124-2022-5-54-77
OpenAlexW4381572498
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Introduction of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism over the period from 2023 to 2026 together with corporate commitments to achieve carbon neutrality and carry out commercial decarbonization have markedly increased interest in assessing the potential of carbon sequestration by Russian forests as a possible way to achieve decarbonization and facilitate Russian exports. The prevailing opinion in business circles is that a significant net positive carbon balance from Russia’s forests could circumvent the need for businesses to make costly reductions in their direct CO2 emissions. However, international decarbonization strategies and standards do not concur with that idea. Direct emissions will have to be reduced. Offset mechanisms, whose benefits are calculated as the difference between a baseline and an improved scenario for forest management (the principle of additionality), will compensate for only a part of the emissions. The experience of Canada is indicative, as it consistently implements measures to decarbonize industry without regard to the absorption of CO2 by its forests. Even though Canada has climatic conditions, forest growth, and population density similar to Russia’s, its policy is not dependent upon revising estimates of net CO2 absorption by forests upward. Forestry priorities in Russia, including reforestation, should instead be gradually shifted from managing commercial forests for harvesting timber to reducing all forest fires. Leased and non-leased forests should both be included, and reforestation that favors deciduous species and mixed forests should be given a higher priority. It is also necessary to remove barriers to forestry in agricultural forests and to plan for implementation of projects directed at improving both forestry and climate on the land leased out from the holdings of the State Forest Fund as well as on agricultural tracts, including those now overgrown by forests

Additionality · Business · Carbon neutrality · Carbon offset · Carbon sequestration · Climate change · Economics · Environmental economics · Forest management · Geography · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Reforestation · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Ecology · Forestry

  • Nature-Based Offsets in Russia

    Open Access•N K Kurichev, Н К Куричев et al.•Regional Research of Russia•2023

  • Decarbonization via Nature-Based Solutions

    Open Access•A V Ptichnikov, А В Птичников et al.•Regional Research of Russia•2023

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae