Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Crystal Is Creepy, but Cool”

Mapping Folk Theories and Responses to Automated Personality Recognition Algorithms

Bibliographic Data

ID13018922
AuthorsT Liao (0000-0003-1889-3831, University of Cincinnati, corresponding author), Olivia Tyson (University of Cincinnati)
Year2021
Volume7
Issue2
Publication date2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Media + Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2056-3051 • E-ISSN: 2056-3051
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/20563051211010170
OpenAlexW3154112498
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited49

This article examines Crystal Knows, a company that generates automated personality profiles through an algorithm and sells access to their database. These algorithms are the result of a long line of research into computational and predictive algorithms that track social media practices and uses them to infer individual characteristics and make psychometric assessments. Although it is now computationally possible, these algorithms are not widely known or understood by the general public. Little is known about how people would respond to them, particularly when they do not even know their online activities are being assessed by the algorithm. This study examines how people construct “snap” folk theories about the ways personality algorithms operate as well as how they react when shown their outputs. Through qualitative interviews ( n = 37) with people after being presented with their own profile, this study identifies a series of folk theories that people came up with to explain the personality algorithm across four dimensions (data source, scope, collection process, and outputs). In addition, this study examined how those folk theories contributed to certain reactions, fears, and justifications people had about the algorithm. This study builds on our theoretical understanding of folk theory literature as well as certain limitations of algorithmic transparency/sovereignty when these types of inferential and predictive algorithms get coupled with people’s hopes and fears about employment, hiring, and promotion

Algorithm · Big Five personality traits · Machine learning · Personality · Promotion (chess · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Personality Traits and Psychology · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Visioning a two-level human–machine communication framework

    Open Access•Kun Xu, Jingyuan Shi•Communication Theory•2024

  • If you’re reading this, it’s meant for you

    Open Access•Kelley Cotter, Amy Ritchart et al.•Convergence The International…•2024

  • If it is bad, why don’t I quit? Algorithmic recommendation use strategy from folk theories

    Open Access•Keyi Chen•Global Media and China•2024

  • Artificial Intelligence and New Voices in Environmental Campaigning

    Open Access•Ella Muncie•Environmental Communication•2026

  • Making Sense of Responsibility

    Open Access•Marco Scalvini•Social Media + Society•2023

  • You Can (Not) Say What You Want

    Open Access•Ella Steen, Kathryn Yurechko et al.•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Filter Bubbles and the Unfeeling

    Open Access•Ermelinda Rodilosso•Philosophy & Technology•2024

  • The New Brave World of Public Relations

    Nur Uysal, Tong Deng•International Journal of…•2025

  • Facets of algorithmic literacy

    Open Access•David E Silva, Chan Chen et al.•New Media & Society•2022

  • If…Then

    Taina Bucher•If... Then•2018

  • Algorithms of Oppression

    Safiya Umoja Noble, Safiya Noble•Algorithms of Oppression•2020

  • "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]"

    Open Access•Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman et al.•Proceedings of the 33rd Annual…•2015

  • Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans

    Open Access•Wu Youyou, Michal Kosinski et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior

    Open Access•Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed

    Open Access•Emilee Rader, Rebecca Gray•Proceedings of the 33rd Annual…•2015

  • Algorithmic Accountability

    Nicholas Diakopoulos•Digital Journalism•2015

  • How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation

    Open Access•Michael A DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz et al.•Proceedings of the 2018 CHI…•2018

  • The Relevance of Algorithms

    Tarleton Gillespie•Media Technologies•2014

  • Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing

    Open Access•Eric P S Baumer, Phil Adams et al.•Proceedings of the SIGCHI…•2013

  • "Algorithms ruin everything"

    Open Access•Michael A DeVito, Darren Gergle et al.•Proceedings of the 2017 CHI…•2017

  • First I "like" it, then I hide it

    Open Access•Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios et al.•Proceedings of the 2016 CHI…•2016

  • Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion

    Open Access•Sandra C Matz, Michal Kosinski et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media

    Open Access•H Andrew Schwartz, Johannes C Eichstaedt et al.•PLoS ONE•2013

  • The Black Box Society

    Frank Pasquale•Black Box Society•2015

  • Imagined Communities

    Open Access•Alessandro Acquisti, Ralph Gross•Privacy Enhancing Technologies•2006

  • Ripinstagram

    Open Access•Martina Mahnke Skrubbeltrang, Josefine Grunnet et al.•First Monday•2017

  • The Mutual Domestication of Users and Algorithmic Recommendations on Netflix

    Open Access•Ignacio Siles, Johan Espinoza Rojas et al.•Communication Culture and Critique•2019

  • Seeing without knowing

    Open Access•Mike Ananny, K Crawford•New Media & Society•2016

  • Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook

    Open Access•Taina Bucher•New Media & Society•2012

  • The corporate cultivation of digital resignation

    Open Access•Nora A Draper, Joseph Turow•New Media & Society•2019

  • Explicating Cues

    Open Access•Kun Xu, T Liao•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2019

  • Facebook and Online Privacy

    Open Access•Bernhard Debatin, Jennette Lovejoy et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2009

  • Decoding algorithms

    Open Access•Stine Lomborg, Patrick Heiberg Kapsch•Media Culture & Society•2020

  • Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions

    Open Access•Min Kyung Lee•Big Data & Society•2018

  • Automating Inequality

    Hannah Lebovits•Public Integrity•2019

  • Thinking critically about and researching algorithms

    Rob Kitchin•Information Communication & Society•2016

  • Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action

    Open Access•Shoshana Zuboff•New Labor Forum•2019

  • The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions

    Open Access•Tal Zarsky•Science Technology & Human Values•2016

  • Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify

    Open Access•Ignacio Siles, Andrés Segura-Castillo et al.•Big Data & Society•2020

  • How the machine 'thinks

    Open Access•Jenna Burrell•Big Data & Society•2016

  • Thinking Outside the Black-Box

    Open Access•Urbano Reviglio, Claudio Agosti•Social Media + Society•2020

  • Concepts and Folk Theories

    A Gelman, Susan A Gelman et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2011

Unique citing works9
Citations per year2,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae