Crystal Is Creepy, but Cool”
Mapping Folk Theories and Responses to Automated Personality Recognition Algorithms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13018922 |
|---|---|
| Authors | T Liao (0000-0003-1889-3831, University of Cincinnati, corresponding author), Olivia Tyson (University of Cincinnati) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Media + Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2056-3051 • E-ISSN: 2056-3051 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20563051211010170 |
| OpenAlex | W3154112498 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 49 |
This article examines Crystal Knows, a company that generates automated personality profiles through an algorithm and sells access to their database. These algorithms are the result of a long line of research into computational and predictive algorithms that track social media practices and uses them to infer individual characteristics and make psychometric assessments. Although it is now computationally possible, these algorithms are not widely known or understood by the general public. Little is known about how people would respond to them, particularly when they do not even know their online activities are being assessed by the algorithm. This study examines how people construct “snap” folk theories about the ways personality algorithms operate as well as how they react when shown their outputs. Through qualitative interviews ( n = 37) with people after being presented with their own profile, this study identifies a series of folk theories that people came up with to explain the personality algorithm across four dimensions (data source, scope, collection process, and outputs). In addition, this study examined how those folk theories contributed to certain reactions, fears, and justifications people had about the algorithm. This study builds on our theoretical understanding of folk theory literature as well as certain limitations of algorithmic transparency/sovereignty when these types of inferential and predictive algorithms get coupled with people’s hopes and fears about employment, hiring, and promotion
Algorithm · Big Five personality traits · Machine learning · Personality · Promotion (chess · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Personality Traits and Psychology · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Visioning a two-level human–machine communication framework
If you’re reading this, it’s meant for you
If it is bad, why don’t I quit? Algorithmic recommendation use strategy from folk theories
Artificial Intelligence and New Voices in Environmental Campaigning
Making Sense of Responsibility
You Can (Not) Say What You Want
Filter Bubbles and the Unfeeling
The New Brave World of Public Relations
Facets of algorithmic literacy
If…Then
Algorithms of Oppression
"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]"
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior
Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed
Algorithmic Accountability
How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation
The Relevance of Algorithms
Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing
"Algorithms ruin everything"
First I "like" it, then I hide it
Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion
Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media
The Black Box Society
Imagined Communities
Ripinstagram
The Mutual Domestication of Users and Algorithmic Recommendations on Netflix
Seeing without knowing
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
The corporate cultivation of digital resignation
Explicating Cues
Facebook and Online Privacy
Decoding algorithms
Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions
Automating Inequality
Thinking critically about and researching algorithms
Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action
The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions
Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify
How the machine 'thinks
Thinking Outside the Black-Box
Concepts and Folk Theories
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |