Lessons Learned from the Colorado Project to Comprehensively Combat Human Trafficking
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13025304 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Annie Miller (0000-0002-1376-3029, University of Denver, corresponding author), Julie Anne Laser (University of Denver), Annjanette R Alejano-Steele (0009-0009-3563-9502, Metropolitan State University of Denver), Kara Napolitano (Metropolitan State University of Denver), Nevita George (0000-0002-6060-0396), Natcha Connot (0000-0002-6961-9448, University of Denver), Amanda Finger (0000-0001-8448-314X) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 51-51 |
| Publication date | 2023-02-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Societies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2075-4698 • E-ISSN: 2075-4698 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/soc13030051 |
| OpenAlex | W4321496032 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 23 |
Countering human trafficking at a statewide level requires a combination of knowledge from lived experience, inter-sector collaborations, and evidence-based tools to measure progress. Since 2010, the nonprofit Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking (LCHT) has collected and analyzed the data on how partners and organizations across the state work toward ending human trafficking. LCHT uses Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to measure and illuminate promising paths toward ending human trafficking. Through CBPR, many collaborative working documents and activities have been created: Colorado Action Plans, Policy Recommendations, a Partnership Toolkit, and Partnership Convenings. This paper provides a single case study analysis of the Colorado Project, from 2013 through 2023, and offers a glimpse into the goals for the Colorado Project 2028. The ideas, strengths, and challenges presented here can guide other local efforts to support data-informed responses to trafficking. The CBPR methodology sheds light on the changes in Colorado’s anti-trafficking movement and the actions taken on behalf of partnerships (task forces and coalitions) across the state of Colorado. This paper offers a roadmap for collaborative design and decision-making among academic, nonprofit, and public sector partners seeking to conduct research on social movements utilizing a community-engaged process
Citizen journalism · Community-based participatory research · Criminology · General partnership · Human trafficking · Participatory action research · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Sex work and related issues
Centering Survivors, Rethinking Evaluation
Implementing the Assets and Logic Strategic Planning Tool to Address Human Trafficking in a Small Midwestern State
“Sharing Information is the Most Effective Way to Prevent…Human Trafficking”
Discouraging the Demand That Fosters Sex Trafficking
Social rehabilitation process of human trafficking victims in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Special Issue “Frontiers in Organizing Processes
How Do Local Efforts Address a Global Issue? Communities Need Good Data
Engaged Scholarship
Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports
A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries
Participatory action research and the public sphere
Making a dent in human trafficking
Accountability Myopia
The Colorado Project to Comprehensively Combat Human Trafficking
A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse, and Structure
Ethical Community-Engaged Research
Anti–Human Trafficking Interventions
Interpretive Research Aiming at Theory Building
Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research
Assets and Logic
Immigration Policies and Access to the Justice System
Combatting Human Trafficking since Palermo
Human Trafficking
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |