Government versus the people – The mismatch in value use to assess solar farms in the Netherlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13067374 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wouter Schram (0000-0003-3407-7893, University of Twente, corresponding author), Sanne Akerboom (0000-0003-0001-7753, Utrecht University), Herman Lelieveldt (0000-0002-6387-3488, Roosevelt Institute for American Studies), Gert Jan Kramer (0000-0002-8983-4516, Utrecht University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 107 |
| Pages | 103344-103344 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Energy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103344 |
| OpenAlex | W4388838859 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 26 |
In energy projects, especially in controversial ones, two trajectories of assessment can be distinguished: a formal trajectory, embedded in the legal system, and an informal trajectory, residing in the public discourse. Often, there is a fundamental mismatch between these two trajectories. The informal trajectory arises because local residents perceive certain shortcomings in values used to assess the project in the formal trajectory. In this paper, we investigate the role values play in the assessments of eight utility-scale solar farms in two municipalities in the Netherlands. Based on policy documents, transcripts of city council meetings and newspaper articles, we identify seven values that play an important role in the assessment of solar farms. In order of their occurrence: Prudent land use, Procedural justice, Minimized observable impact on surroundings, Legality, Sustainability, Financial distributive justice and Innovation. Of these, Legality and Sustainability are most used as arguments in favor of solar farms (mostly in the formal trajectory), whereas Procedural justice, Prudent land use and Minimized impact on surroundings are most used in arguments against solar farms (in both trajectories). Our empirical results indicate that a solar farm is more likely to be controversial when only a minimal formal evaluation framework is in place. Based on our results, we recommend policymakers to develop comprehensive evaluation frameworks for energy projects, as well as to organize a multitude of interaction opportunities between the formal and informal trajectory. In this way, the interaction between the two trajectories can lead to better-quality and better-supported decisions on energy projects
Business · Economic Justice · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Government (linguistics · Political science · Principle of legality · Public economics · Sustainability · Trajectory · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Law · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Ecology
The dynamics of participation
Making sense of acceptance and acceptability
Made in Australia, used in Asia
Fields for food or electricity
Are we on the same page? Understanding value similarity and its impact on public trust in institutions of the energy sector
Politics over photovoltaics
Toward a human-centered energy transition
Energy justice
Societal acceptance of wind farms
Translating Values into Design Requirements
‘Successful’ low-carbon energy transitions at the community level? An energy justice perspective
Procedural (in)justice in the implementation of solar energy
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Energy justice
Knowledge politics, vulnerability and recognition-based justice
Place attachment and preferences for wind energy – A value-based approach
When controversies cascade
Scales of solar energy
Where are the citizens? Unravelling the lopsided nature of stakeholder participation in the Dutch regional energy transition
The role of community benefits in community acceptance of multifunctional solar farms in the Netherlands
Pre- and post-installation community perceptions of wind farm projects
Deliberation or doctrine? Land use and spatial planning for sustainable development in Sweden
An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social
| Citations per year | 3.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |