Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Even if you’re trying to do something good’

More-than-chemical separations of lithium recycling in a Norwegian science laboratory

Bibliographic Data

ID13069442
AuthorsMichelle Geraerts (0009-0007-4555-6976, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume25
Pages101775-101775
Publication date2025-10-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Extractive Industries and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-790X • E-ISSN: 2214-7918
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.exis.2025.101775
OpenAlexW7104416451
LanguageEN
References cited21

This article shows the complex entanglements of chemical laboratory work towards lithium recycling from end-of-life car batteries with colonial modernity, particularly in the Norwegian context, and asks what thinking with colonial modernity does or does not do for crafting more-than-chemical connections. • Norway's green shift includes a rapid and large-scale adoption of electric cars, which brings new challenges around the recyclability of lithium-ion batteries. Lithium from car batteries is not recycled on industrial scale today, and is commonly lost in smelters' slag. To reduce the need for mining and wasting lithium, its recyclability presents an increasingly pressing issue. • Through ethnographic research in a university laboratory in Norway, this article delves deeper into what 'good recycling' might mean in the eyes of a team of scientists experimenting with lithium recovery using green chemistry methods. • The article foregrounds hopes, doubts, questions and concerns the scientists aspiring a green process for lithium recycling have, and highlights the imaginative and material separations to which envisioned 'closed loop' lithium currently relates, beyond chemical processes. • Key challenges identified are that closed loop lithium recycling knowledge is accumulated and concentrated in oil-wealthy Norway, through dynamics of appropriation that perpetuate uneven geographies of green transitions; that lithium recycling processes are tied to often-forgotten material requirements and additions - identified as 'open ends' of the closed loop; and that 'green' lithium recycling legitimises overconsumption of lithium in a vicious cycle that reproduces or even increases rather than minimises the need for primary mining. Norway's green shift includes a rapid and large-scale adoption of electric cars, which brings new challenges around the recyclability of lithium-ion batteries. Lithium from car batteries is not recycled on industrial scale today, and is commonly lost in smelters' slag. To reduce the need for mining and wasting lithium, its recyclability presents an increasingly pressing issue. Through ethnographic research in a university laboratory in Norway, this article delves deeper into what 'good recycling' might mean in the eyes of a team of scientists experimenting with lithium recovery using 'green chemistry' methods. The article foregrounds hopes, doubts, questions and concerns expressed by the scientists aspiring a green process for lithium recycling, and highlights the imaginative and material separations to which envisioned 'closed loop' lithium currently relates, beyond chemical processes. Key challenges identified, using the ethnographic concept 'more-than-chemical separations', are that closed loop lithium recycling knowledge is accumulated and concentrated in oil-wealthy Norway, through dynamics of appropriation that perpetuate uneven geographies of green transitions; that lithium recycling processes are tied to often-forgotten material requirements and additions - identified as 'open ends' of the closed loop; and that 'greening' lithium recycling may legitimise overconsumption of lithium in a vicious cycle that reproduces or even increases rather than minimises the need for primary mining. The article closes with reflections on the need for more-than-chemical connections, as openings for imagining a liveable future together in which green lithium recycling could have a key role

Appropriation · Ethnography · Lithium (medication · Norwegian · Process (computing · Scale (ratio · Work (physics · Extraction and Separation Processes · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Water Governance and Infrastructure

  • Jevons' paradox

    Open Access•Blake Alcott•Ecological Economics•2005

  • Imperialism, Ecological Imperialism, and Green Imperialism

    Alejandro Pedregal, Nemanja Lukić•Journal of Labor and Society•2024

  • Wind Energy on Trial in Saepmie

    Open Access•Eva Maria Fjellheim•Arctic review on law and politics•2023

  • Toward feminist energy systems

    Open Access•Shannon Bell, Carole Daggett et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Comparing coal and ‘transition materials’? Overlooking complexity, flattening reality and ignoring capitalism

    Open Access•Alexander Dunlap, Diego Muñoz Marín•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Energy transitions in a time of intersecting precarities

    Open Access•Myles Lennon•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Cycling and recycling

    Simon Werrett•Journal of Contemporary European…•2016

  • Green colonialism in the Nordic context

    Open Access•Susanne Normann•Journal of Community Psychology•2021

  • Decolonizing energy

    Open Access•Myles Lennon•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Making time for soil

    Open Access•Maria Puig De La Bellacasa•Social Studies of Science•2015

  • Anticolonial Strategies for the Recovery and Maintenance of Indigenous Knowledge

    Leanne R Simpson, Leanne Simpson•The American Indian Quarterly•2004

  • Mining the Energy Transition

    Angela Kronenburg García, Nikkie Wiegink•Anthropological Quarterly•2024

  • Anticipation

    Open Access•Vincanne Adams, Michelle Murphy et al.•Subjectivity•2009

  • Lithium extractivism and water injustices in the Salar de Atacama, Chile

    Open Access•Bárbara Jerez, Ignasi Garcés et al.•Political Geography•2021

  • The socionature that neo-extractivism can see

    Open Access•Esben Leifsen•Political Geography•2020

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

  • Circularity and Enclosures

    Open Access•A Zhang•Cultural Anthropology•2020

  • Anthropologists Are Talking - About the Anthropocene

    Donna Haraway, Noboru Ishikawa et al.•Ethnos•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae