Artificial intelligence in South African universities
Curriculum transformation and decolonisation—aid or obstacle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13077124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Maimela (0000-0001-6529-3172, University of Pretoria, corresponding author), Palesa Mbonde (University of Pretoria) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 1543471-1543471 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-7775 • E-ISSN: 2297-7775 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1543471 |
| PMID | 40697567 |
| OpenAlex | W4412618473 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 34 |
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in South African universities presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly within the context of curriculum transformation and decolonisation. This paper critically examines the relevance of AI in relation to the #FeesMustFall movement, which advocates for equitable access to education, and explores how these themes intersect with decolonisation efforts in South Africa. Although AI technologies promise advantages like tailored learning experiences, improved administrative processes, and enhanced research capabilities, they also present issues related to epistemic bias, digital disparities, and the reinforcement of Western-centric knowledge systems. Grounded in empirical research, this study investigates whether AI serves as an aid or an obstacle in South African higher education, with a specific focus on Historically White Universities (HWUs) and Historically Black Universities (HBUs). Using the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory as a framework, the research explores disparities in AI adoption across institutions, analysing infrastructural constraints, policy gaps, and the broader implications of AI for knowledge production. The findings reveal that while HWUs have made significant strides in AI integration due to better funding and international collaborations, HBUs continue to face systemic barriers that hinder equitable access to AI-driven learning tools. Moreover, AI's reliance on Western datasets and epistemologies risks perpetuating digital colonialism, complicating ongoing efforts to decolonise the curriculum. This paper underlines the urgent need for Afrocentric AI models that align with local contexts and values, inclusive policy frameworks that address the needs highlighted by #FeesMustFall, and targeted investments in digital infrastructure. By doing so, it aims to ensure that AI contributes meaningfully to higher education curriculum transformation and decolonisation in South Africa
Curriculum · Decolonization · Obstacle · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Transformation (genetics · Law · Second Language Learning and Teaching
Algorithms of Oppression
Understanding Technology Adoption
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
Fees Must Fall
Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices
Covid-19 and the Digital Transformation of Education
A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning
A Wake-Up Call
Decolonisation of higher education
Reframing the curriculum
Decolonizing the university
The Debate on University Transformation in South Africa
Transformation Tensions in Higher Education
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |