Wild Resources in the Economy of Bronze and Early Iron Ages Between Oder and Bug Rivers – Source Overview
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13077417 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katarzyna Ślusarska (0000-0003-0069-7461, University of Szczecin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 177-210 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Open Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2300-6560 • E-ISSN: 2300-6560 |
| Publisher | De Gruyter Open (PUBLISHER • PL) |
| DOI | 10.1515/opar-2020-0134 |
| OpenAlex | W3158085810 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 13 |
The archaeological discussion still appears to largely disregard the role of natural resources in the early agricultural economy of Central Europe. Cereal cultivation and animal husbandry strategies remain a central area of studies. Wild resources are the only proxy data helping to reconstruct the strategies mentioned above. The data for the assessment of the wild resource role in consumption strategies are scarce. Plant and animal remains preserved within the archaeological sites represent one of the very few sources of information. The dominant funeral rite – cremation – leaves no opportunity for insight into the human bones’ diet composition signatures. This study’s primary goal is to gather in one place all information concerning wild resource food use based on archaeological data, which is scattered through various publications. The study’s time scope corresponds to Lusatian, post-Lusatian (Pomeranian Face Urn Culture), and contemporary cultures (Western Baltic Kurgans Culture). It covers roughly the time span 1400–400 BC, which is the late Bronze and early Iron Ages. Only data from a homogenous settlement context was included within the presented review. Although the reviewed literature methodology does not always meet the modern standard, it still offers insight into broader plant and animal food use in the past. The animal bone analysis is usually based on hand-collected bone material or sifted soil samples. Malacological materials come from sampled features. Some clam mussels were also identified among the bone materials submitted for zooarchaeological analysis. All plant materials come from sampled features undergoing soil analysis
Agriculture · Animal husbandry · Archaeological record · Archaeology · Biology · Bronze Age · Context (archaeology · Domestication · Exploitation of natural resources · Geography · Iron Age · Natural resource · Resource (disambiguation · Zooarchaeology · Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Historical and Archaeological Studies · History · Ecology
Frogs as a part of the Eneolithic diet. Archaeozoological records from the Czech Republic (Kutná Hora-Denemark site, Řivnáč Culture)
Useful plants from the site Lutomiersk–Koziówki near Łódź (central Poland) with special reference to the earliest find of Xanthium strumarium L. seeds in Europe
Changes in the utilization of wild green vegetables in Poland since the 19th century
Iron Age Cultigen? Experimental Return Rates for Fat Hen ( Chenopodium album L.)
Iron Age Cultigen? Experimental Return Rates for Fat Hen ( Chenopodium album L.)
Fast or feast
Depozyty ze szczątkami mięczaków na stanowiskach kultury łużyckiej z Polski. Charakterystyka i próba określenia ich genezy
The role of Chenopodium in the subsistence economy of pioneer agriculturalists on the northern frontier of the Linear Pottery culture in Kuyavia, central Poland
Animals in Bronze Age Europe
Wild vegetable mixes sold in the markets of Dalmatia (southern Croatia)
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |