Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Semantic Segmentation of Archaeological Features on Public Lands

Case Study of Historical Cotton Terraces within the Piedmont National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia, USA

Bibliographic Data

ID13085187
AuthorsClaudine Gravel-Miguel (0000-0003-1324-7937, New Mexico Consortium, corresponding author), Grant Snitker (0000-0003-3548-2241, New Mexico Consortium), Jayde Hirniak (0000-0001-6491-8097, Arizona State University), Katherine Peck (0009-0008-4068-2591, New Mexico Consortium), Alex Fetterhoff (New Mexico Consortium)
Year2025
Volume13
Issue2
Pages291-314
Publication date2025-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAdvances in Archaeological Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2326-3768 • E-ISSN: 2326-3768
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/aap.2025.1
OpenAlexW7082382243
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited46

The logistics, costs, and capacity needed to complete extensive archaeological pedestrian surveys to inventory cultural resources present challenges to public land managers. To address these issues, we developed a workflow combining lidar-derived imagery and deep learning (DL) models tailored for cultural resource management (CRM) programs on public lands. It combines Python scripts that fine-tune models to recognize archaeological features in lidar-derived imagery with denoising QGIS steps that improve the predictions’ performance and applicability. We present this workflow through an applied case study focused on detecting historic agricultural terraces in the Piedmont National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia, USA. For this project, we fine-tuned pretrained U-Net models to teach them to recognize agricultural terraces in imagery, identified the parameter settings that led to the highest recall for detecting terraces, and used those settings to train models on incremental dataset sizes, which allowed us to identify the minimum training size necessary to obtain satisfying models. Results present effective models that can detect most terraces even when trained on small datasets. This study provides a robust methodology that requires basic proficiencies in Python coding but expands DL applications in federal CRM by advancing methods in lidar and machine learning for archaeological inventorying, monitoring, and preservation

Cultural heritage · Land use · Public use · Python (programming language · Satellite imagery · Scripting language · Segmentation · Workflow · Electrical and Electromagnetic Research · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Geological Modeling and Analysis

  • A Computer Vision Survey of the Northern San Juan

    Open Access•Sean Field, Logan Dean•American Antiquity•2026

  • The Importance of Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation for Computer Vision in Archaeology

    Open Access•M D Mccoy, Hannah Moncrieff•Heritage•2026

  • Using Simulated Training Data to Locate Archaeological Sites with Machine Learning

    Open Access•Katherine Peck, Claudine Gravel-Miguel et al.•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2026

  • Deep Learning–Based Detection of Ancient Agricultural Terraces Using Multisensor Data Fusion

    Open Access•Emin Atabey Peker•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2026

  • Faster R-CNN

    Open Access•Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He et al.•IEEE Transactions on Pattern…•2017

  • Why Not a Single Image? Combining Visualizations to Facilitate Fieldwork and On-Screen Mapping

    Open Access•Žiga Kokalj, Maja Somrak•Remote Sensing•2019

  • The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation

    Open Access•Davide Chicco, Giuseppe Jurman•BMC Genomics•2020

  • Mask R-CNN

    Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari et al.•2017 IEEE International…•2017

  • ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge

    Open Access•Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng et al.•International Journal of Computer…•2015

  • Sky-View Factor as a Relief Visualization Technique

    Open Access•Klemen Zakšek, Krištof Oštir et al.•Remote Sensing•2011

  • Array programming with NumPy

    Open Access•Charles R Harris, K Jarrod Millman et al.•Nature•2020

  • You Only Look Once

    Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala et al.•2016 IEEE Conference on Computer…•2016

  • Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar

    Open Access•Damian Evans, Damian H Evans et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • Combining Deep Learning and Location-Based Ranking for Large-Scale Archaeological Prospection of LiDAR Data from The Netherlands

    Open Access•Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart, Karsten Lambers et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2020

  • Combined Detection and Segmentation of Archeological Structures from LiDAR Data Using a Deep Learning Approach

    Open Access•Alexandre Guyot, Marc Lennon et al.•Journal of Computer Applications…•2021

  • Implementing State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Approaches for Archaeological Object Detection in Remotely-Sensed Data

    Open Access•Martin S Olivier, Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart•Journal of Computer Applications…•2021

  • Learning to Look at LiDAR

    Open Access•Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart, Karsten Lambers•Journal of Computer Applications…•2019

  • An approach to the automatic surveying of prehistoric barrows through LiDAR

    Open Access•Enrique Cerrillo-Cuenca•Quaternary International•2017

  • When Computers Dream of Charcoal

    Open Access•Benjamin Carter, Jeff Blackadar et al.•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2021

  • High‐resolution airborne Light Detection and Ranging data, ethics and archaeology

    Open Access•Katharine M Johnson, Timothy H Ives et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2021

  • Using deep neural networks on airborne laser scanning data

    Open Access•Øivind Due Trier, Dave Cowley et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • LiDAR‐derived Local Relief Models – a new tool for archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Ralf Hesse•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • Automated large‐scale mapping and analysis of relict charcoal hearths in Connecticut (USA) using a Deep Learning Yolov4 framework

    Open Access•Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart, Alexander Bonhage et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2022

  • A Comparison of Visualization Techniques for Models Created from Airborne Laser Scanned Data

    Open Access•Rebecca Bennett, Kate Welham et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • Investigating ancient agricultural field systems in Sweden from airborne Lidar data by using convolutional neural network

    Open Access•Melda Küçükdemirci, G Landeschi et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2022

  • Deep learning reveals extent of Archaic Native American shell-ring building practices

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis, Gino Caspari et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2021

  • Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize

    Open Access•Arlen F Chase, Diane Z Chase et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2010

  • Airborne lidar survey of irrigated agricultural landscapes

    Open Access•M D Mccoy, Gregory P Asner et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2011

  • Agricultural potential and actualized development in Hawai’i

    Open Access•T N Ladefoged, M D Mccoy et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2011

  • Automated feature extraction for prospection and analysis of monumental earthworks from aerial LiDAR in the Kingdom of Tonga

    Open Access•Travis Freeland, Brandon Heung et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2016

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae