Explicative-Existencial Justificacion of Human Rights Analysis of Robert Alexy's Argument in Context of Is-Ought Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13092883 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Hapla (0000-0002-6977-3939, Masaryk University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Issue | 15 |
| Pages | 105-116 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Age of Human Rights Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2340-9592 • E-ISSN: 2340-9592 |
| Publisher | Universidad de Jaen (PUBLISHER • ES) |
| DOI | 10.17561/tahrj.v15.5780 |
| OpenAlex | W3111047546 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
This paper analyzes Robert Alexy's explicative-existential justification of human rights. According to the author, there are two problems connected with this concept. It cannot establish human rights universally and explain why we should accept them. In the paper, these questions are addressed in the context of the Is-Ought problem. Alexy's approach is compared with other theories that strive for human rights justification (basic needs approach, capability approach, and the foundationalism of Alan Gewirth). The author finds that in this respect all other theories have similar disadvantages. The inability to adequately elucidate the transition from Is to Ought is a general problem in moral philosophy, and therefore cannot diminish the position of Alexy's justification in this context. Although his approach does not really meet certain absolute requirements for good justification, if we evaluate it in relation to other available alternatives, we have to acknowledge its significant place in the philosophy of human rights. Even with Alexy's theory, however, the problem persists that it establishes rights of human persons rather than rights of human beings. It is therefore not able to fulfill some of its universalist aspirations
Argument (complex analysis · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Existentialism · Foundationalism · Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Relation (database · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theology and Sovereignty · War, Ethics, and Justification
Proportionality and Justification
The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning
The Is-Ought Question
The Epistemology of Human Rights
Human Needs, Human Rights
Natural Human Rights
Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights
In Defence of Moral Rights
Human Rights and Capabilities
Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice
Theory of Needs as Justification of Human Rights
The possibility of secular human rights
Grounding human rights
How to Derive "Ought" From "Is
The "Is-Ought" Gap
Elements of a Theory of Human Rights
| Highly cited | No |
|---|