Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carter Johnson, Partition and Post-War Violence Case Study of Moldova and Pridnestrovie

Bibliographic Data

ID13093296
AuthorsCarter Johnson (0000-0002-6679-833X, corresponding author), James Carney (0000-0001-6064-7867), Thomas Carothers, Kanchan Chandra (0000-0002-1835-3707), Giacomo Chiozza (0000-0002-6046-0901), H Goemans, George Church, See Paul, Lani Elliott, Håvard Hegre (0000-0002-5076-0994), Anke Hoeffler (0000-0002-0684-6096), Marta Reynal-Querol (0000-0002-0293-5446), Nicholas Sambanis (0000-0002-1270-289X), Paul Collier (0009-0005-5671-6707), Michael Croft (0000-0002-6062-3635), Alexander Downes, Daniel Esty, A JACK, Ted Goldstone, Pamela Gurr, Alan Surko, Unger Unger, James Fearon, David Laitin, Charles Glaser, Jeffrey Herbst, Michael Horowitz (0000-0002-0942-0306), Alex Weisiger (0000-0001-5046-1217), Erin Jenne, Robert Jervis (0000-0002-1896-6538), Stathis Kalyvas, Chaim Kaufmann, Charles King (0000-0001-8665-3376), Roy Licklider, Oazu Nantoi, Barry Posen, Irina Shchegoleva, Vladimir Socor, Barbara Walter, Lucan Way
Year2013
Volume1
Issue1-2
Pages180-189
Publication date2013-12-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLURAL History Culture Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2345-1262 • E-ISSN: 2345-184X
PublisherEditura ARC (PUBLISHER • MD)
DOI10.37710/plural.v1i1-2_10
OpenAlexW4247793358
LanguageEN
References cited1

Partition advocates argue that ethnic groups must be separated completely in order to prevent renewed violence but Moldova is an exception with its large “stay-behind” minority and a lack of renewed violence. This chapter uses Moldova to develop partition theory, presenting an institutionalized explanation that focuses on the interaction between state-building and minority collaboration in a post-war context. The chapter argues that strong state institutions create an incentive for ethnic minorities to collaborate with the state, regardless of minority preferences, and this helps maintain peace. The case of Moldova reinforces the importance of state-strength in avoiding interethnic conflict renewal. Both Pridnestrovie/Transnistria and Moldova were a relatively strong state, which is unusual in a post-war, post-partition situation, and these relative strengths reduced the likelihood of conflict recurrence

Context (archaeology · Criminology · Economics · Ethnic group · Incentive · Microeconomics · Partition (number theory · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · History · Law · Mathematics · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · South Asian Studies and Conflicts

  • Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State

    Open Access•Mark R Beissinger•Nationalist Mobilization and the…•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae