Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why John Q. Voter Did Not Learn Much from the 1976 Presidential Debates

Bibliographic Data

ID13105513
AuthorsDoris Α Graber (University of Illinois Chicago, corresponding author), Young Yun Kim (0000-0002-6305-0182, Governors State University)
Year1978
Volume2
Issue1
Pages407-421
Publication date1978-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of the International Communication Association (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2380-8977 • E-ISSN: 2380-8985
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/23808985.1978.11923739
OpenAlexW2765593726
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited7

The results reported in this paper about political learning from the 1976 presidential debates are based on a year-long study of all aspects of political learning of a small panel of voters. Debate learning is put into general learning perspectives and distinguishes various levels of learning. Judged in the context of learning throughout the campaign year, new learning from the debates was quite modest, even when the standards for scoring learning are low and inadequate to support the goal of intelligent voting. The knowledge-deficient learned at lower rates, quantitatively and qualitatively, than the better informed. Several factors which are known to inhibit learning were present in the debate scenarios. These include redundancy of information with predebate news supply, excessive complexity of issues with inadequate time for analysis, sketchy postdebate commentary, and general dullness. The audience watched the spectacle only partially and with mixed attention and discounted much of it as mere “campaign rhetoric.”

Context (archaeology · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Presidential campaign · Presidential system · Rhetoric · Sociology · Spectacle · Voting · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • Effects of Watching Primary Debates in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign

    Open Access•William L Benoit, Mitchell S Mckinney et al.•Journal of Communication•2002

  • What Can Voters Learn from Election Debates?

    Open Access•Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Christopher Adasiewicz•Televised Election Debates•2000

  • Communication Forms as Predictors of Issue Knowledge in Presidential Campaigns

    Glenn J Hansen, William L Benoit•Mass Communication & Society•2007

  • Beyond learning and persona

    William L Benoit, Mitchell S Mckinney et al.•Communication Monographs•2001

  • Mass Media and the Knowledge Gap

    Open Access•George A Donohue, Phillip J Tichenor et al.•Communication Research•1975

  • Political ideology

    Robert E Lane•Political ideology•1962

  • Press Coverage and Voter Reaction in the 1968 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Doris A Graber, Doris Α Graber•Political Science Quarterly•1974

  • Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge

    Phillip J Tichenor, George A Donohue et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1970

  • On Political Methodology

    Open Access•Gary King•Political Analysis•1990

Citations per year0.15
Citation span2000 - 2007 (8)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae