Bridging the intergenerational gap
Boosting recycling behavior and policy support through eliciting concerns for future others
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13109369 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xin Liu (0000-0001-5207-1685, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Chen Jun-fang (0000-0003-0945-962X, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Rui Tao (0000-0001-6333-513X, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences), Shu Li (0000-0003-4402-1674, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Rui Zheng (0009-0007-3672-4552, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Behavioural Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-063X • E-ISSN: 2398-0648 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/bpp.2024.45 |
| OpenAlex | W4405212768 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 68 |
Pro-environmental behavior, including waste sorting and recycling, involves a combination of future-oriented (futureness) and other-oriented (otherness) attributes. Inspired by the perspective of intergenerational choice, this work explores whether eliciting concerns for future others could increase public support for recycling policy and recycling behavior. Study 1 consisted of an online random controlled trial and a laboratory experiment. In Study 1A ( N = 400), future other-concern was primed using a static text manipulation, whereas in Study 1B ( N = 192), a dynamic virtual manipulation was employed. The results showed that people in the conditions that elicited future other-concern reported greater household recycling intentions and more actual recycling behavior than those in the control conditions. Study 2A ( N = 467) and Study 2B ( N = 600) generalized this effect on the acceptance of the ‘Certain Time Certain Place’ waste sorting policy in China. Consistent with the intergenerational choice model, envisioning the future of subsequent generations is more impactful in gaining policy approval than merely envisioning a future time. These findings provide a new method for promoting public policy approval and recycling behavior, suggesting that people could become environmentally friendly when they are guided to consider future others
Bridging (networking · Computer security · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental economics · Perspective (graphical · Public economics · Public policy · Sorting · Waste recycling · Work (physics · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Sustainability in Business
The Structure of Environmental Concern
Greed, Death, and Values
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours
Sympathy and callousness
Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect
Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change
The New Environmental Paradigm Scale
Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim
How Will I Be Remembered? Conserving the Environment for the Sake of One’s Legacy
Vividness of the Future Self Predicts Delinquency
Experiential and instrumental attitudes
Measuring pro-environmental behavior
Increasing Saving Behavior Through Age-Progressed Renderings of the Future Self
Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior
G*Power 3
The Andrew Carnegie Effect
Identity Issues in Groups
Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour
Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change
Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change
Morals and climate decision-making
Reconciling intergenerational conflicts with imaginary future generations
Perceptions of time in relation to climate change
Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation
Perceptions of justice influencing community acceptance of spent nuclear fuel disposal. A case study in two Finnish nuclear communities
Caring about tomorrow
Experiencing Nature
Emotions predict policy support
Activating the legacy motive mitigates intergenerational discounting in the climate game
Give and take frames in shared-resource negotiations
New Environmental Theories
Intergenerational retrospective viewpoint promotes financially sustainable attitude
It's the thought that counts over time
In fairness to future generations
New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes
Thinking About the Future
Air pollution as a determinant of food delivery and related plastic waste
Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |